Message from @Vic33
Discord ID: 652521712088252418
@Magnify ✝ Q 👉MAGA-KAG forget the cell in the car ..
😉
calling him a liar .. for something he heard on the news
Fat retired farmer named jack
Lol
BOOM from Ivanka
👆 <:rofl:508683941406965764>
@Magnify ✝ Q 👉MAGA-KAG i totally agree... yesterday was the start of the end of the DNC
+ deep state ..corruption .. etc
REPUBLIC, not Represenative Democracy.
This goes in the WTF category CRAZY NANCY
https://twitter.com/michaelbeatty3/status/1202791989604798464
3 Pillars = Republic
The Strafor files have Marine emails
I think about smugling ....I will have to look again
judges appointments
@LonghornRancher old man has some balls ... huge corones
thank u @RAKRail
**Under the Constitutional Republic the following will be strictly enforced upon all Local, State, and Federal Governments**
**LICENCING A RIGHT INTO A PRIVILEGE**
> **U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS**
> “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135
> “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.”
CASE LAW: (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
> “If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.”
CASE LAW: (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
**CORPUS DELICTI**
> The body of a crime. The body (material substance) upon which a crime has been committed, e. g., the corpse of a murdered man, the charred remains of a house burned down. In a derivative sense, the substance or foundation of a crime; the substantial fact that a crime has been committed. People v. Dick, 37 Cal. 2S1; White v. State, 49 Ala. 347; Goldman v. Com., 100 Va, 805, 42 S. E. 923; State v. Hand. 1 Marv. (Del.) 545, 41 Atl. 192; State v. Dickson, 78 Mo. 441
**No bodily harm, No property damage (including theft) NO CRIME**
Cited Source: BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY
https://thelawdictionary.org/corpus-delicti/
More found here: https://patriotsblogtalk.wordpress.com/2019/08/26/law-topics/
or this painter ..
time traveler ?