Message from @Dyno
Discord ID: 537707906653749259
I believe there to be a higher law
LOL
lololololoolololololol
Absolute morals
FÜHRER*
thats it...
GULAG
NOW
wait
thats ussr
shit
ГУЛАГ*
To auchswitz
you can pop into the live streams <:Joy9:455695111838498818>
Auschwitz*
<:Joy9:455695111838498818>
Oof
@épée Morals are driven a lot by feelings. You can see it here. If it is wrong to beat someone when she is your wife, which is perfectly acceptable position, then it is wrong to steal from someone when he is your husband, and all alimony and child support laws are as bad as Islamic laws.
The reason why in both cases, West supports women is not because it is moral, but because it fires off its protectionist instinct.
It is not that Liberalism is all wrong, though it is mostly wrong, but that it is all inconsistent. And no one wants to apply it consistently.
We can solve this issue at once by declaring that spouse own the fruits of their labour and marriage does not nullify it and then we can rightly diss Islam. But before that, not without being inconsistent
let me explain
idk
I just want to
cause like
most of the questions I don't understand
so I just press all
ok
its useless anyways
beacuse only your first anwser gets taken into account by the bot
Epey is best nigga
what bot me
😦
@Draco ok so the basic definition of morals is such "standards of behaviour; principles of right and wrong" , think of it like a pack of wolves, if one wolves starts killing other wolves in its own pack that wolves weakens the entire pack does it not
same thing applies here
why humans became social creatures is to survive