I made an anology which outlined the basic premise

@Reaper So we should deny the biggest encyclopedia men ever created

@felldie1496 which is that?

VictortzeToday at 1:21 AM
unless the entire thing is burnt out you would have a bases width left, same reason why we need the fossil itself to determine how much atom is in there
ReaperToday at 1:22 AM
@Victortze that's my point you can know how much carbon the fossil has when you find it
But not when it died or how much carbon it contained at that moment
VictortzeToday at 1:22 AM
no you know how much atoms are in there, how much carbon 12/ 14 is in there
dumb shit nicknameToday at 1:22 AM
does that mean Earth is only 6000 year old ? 🤔
ReaperToday at 1:23 AM
@dumb shit nickname I don't know, I wasn't there
I guess no one here has ever been lied to by an authority figure, oh wait a minute

@felldie1496 and also maybe just parts of it

Wikipedia

no I explained it earlier

you pretend it never happens

so I can now add lying to your list of problem

Is the biggest encyclopedia ever created.

@Victortzeyou explained we can determine it current state I agree

You failed to explain how it accurately predicts the date it parishes

ReaperToday at 1:25 AM
Alls I'm saying is I suspect we have been lied to about more than how woman think I do not accept what I'm told just cause smart ppl think so
Most of those same scientific figures ppl hold on such a pedastal are cucked simps, what does that tell you about the nature of intelligence?


then you shift the goalpost into "scientists cannot be trusted because they are all cucked simps!"

nobody says its "accurate' as there will be margin of error for everything "science"

if someone says the number is 100% correct he is not a scientist,because a margin of error always exists

I was just stating the basis for my original inquiry, that was not an arguement

oh yeah, keep shifting the goalpost

The funny thing is you have done exactly that

My only argument remains the candle analogy

I have received no answer to that

Just shifting

and I just posted the part where I explain you can figure it out

and so you lied , again

funny how trolls keeps gets caught lying once you start posting chat history

@Victortze your explanation is incomplete

my explanation is complete

that's why you immediately jumped to "scientists cannot be trusted !!!1!!"

@Victortzeyou said we know how much carbon it has when we find it

I posted the chat history up there

@Reaper Don't forget to vaccinate your kids

That was already a givin

@Noctah I don't have kids

But I also don't intend on having daddy guvment inject me with shit

He is insulting you as a science denier

@Victortze brilliant

Tell a guy who's mgtow he will be a terrible father to non existent offspring, got me right in the feels

>taking shitposting that seriously

Oh boy

@NoctahI love jokes even at my expense, but dude.....

> thinks denying vaccine is about being a terrible father

@Victortze denying vaccine to my kids....