As for the "external validation" bits, if a man wants to seek higher earning potentials, yet has to be validated via the other, then he must internalize an idea of how the other thinks about him in order to achieve his own success. That is simply another contradiction. You claim that MGTOW liberated men from "external validation", yet in order to even participate in a social system to afford to pay rent, buy clothes, food, etc. a man must seek validation from his employer.

As I said, please seek your local road whore and get married. All your questions shall be answered in time

As soon as a man thinks "I hope my boss will give me that raise", his claim of freedom from external validation is forfeit.

You're monologuing dude

@Longshanks Marrying a woman is totally non-sequitur to what I am talking about. My point is that even when a man rejects to get married, his freedom is still denied. He is simply drawing attention from one set of chains to another...

@Longshanks Good. A Well thought out response is often times lengthy.

No... you're asking rhetorical questions. Then answering them yourself. You're not discoursing, your making a speech

What is the criterion that can be offered to demarcate between a discourse that is simply lengthy vs one that is simply a speech, as you have suggested?

MGTOW is an idea, and no man "liberates" another. Only a man can liberate himself. And I'm not talking about "Universal freedom" for there is no such thing. Clearly the context of MGTOW is female nature. Since culture and industry use female nature as shackles, understanding and navigating her nature is very advantageous for a man

So MGTOW, in your opinion, is simply men protecting themselves from gynocentrism?

All I'm saying is you have to allow the other side to respond to your prepositions (because they are based on a premise)

holy shit Itachi is getting straight up roasted in HHH's recent video with him comments

???

Yes MGTOW is a philisophy for understanding gynocentrism

Perhaps an understanding of MGTOW as only being a way to understand gynocentrism is simply necessary for defining MGTOW, but not sufficient. For example, there is the whole malaise, if you will that comes along after taking the "red-pill".

This malaise, includes opportunities for self-actualization, freedom and self-responsibility, and even as you suggested, some sort of financial advantage from taking the "red-pill".

Gynocentrism defines the existential purpose of most men, whether they are aware of it or not

lol

does anyone know Itachi? or are you mid convo

Itachi is an idiot

Lotta PUAs, pseudointellectuals and attention seekers are drawn to MGTOW.. @Silveru

Females also troll as men

Quite pathetic but I suppose the day will come when MGTOW will become a platform for picking up bitches

Lol

TFM made a video of how spaces are colonized by bitches, who then attract the pussy beggers

@Seven Of Swords After the malaise begins the journey of actually living a life

Are you married? @Seven Of Swords

Of course I'm not fucking married. Marriage is a dogshit deal. As for the supposed journey living of an actual life after the maiase, that remains to be seen. For to reject one set of chains and accept another is not freedom.

What you mean another set of chains?

Are you anarchist/Communist?

Succumbing and actually defending our current system of wage slavery.

You can call me whatever you want, but it doesn't matter.

I didn't make a preposition, I asked a question

I have no idea what to call myself really. The left is too gynocentric so those labels are out.

The right has too many reactionary and fascist shit heads, so that's out as well.

In that case your statement "reject one set of chains for another" is ambiguous

What are the other set of chains you refer to?

The requirement to trade value for what you need/want?

Because if you're unwilling to trade for what you want what other system remains, other than anarchy or Communism

And anarchy is very short lived, voids don't last for long

Also...are you suggesting that "the chains of marriage" is how a man "pays his due" to society? That's the slant religions take, which are a kind of Communism IMO