Okay read the whole thing

it's not supposed to be impressive

all right well what IS this supposed to be? and I hope you don't say "persuasive," because, with all due respect, I think you'd have a really hard time actually convincing anyone of anything by showing them this text

the perspective character is a moron who is perfectly crafted to feed clueless answers and capitulate to talking points which facilitate the author tract of the fascist pirate

meanwhile anyone already well-versed in the subject material isn't really covering new ground, it's pretty elementary stuff

I guess I admire that someone TRIED to distill it into a relatively digestible Plato-esque dialogue

still it reads as nakedly manipulative and intellectually dishonest

You dont need to type like you have a stick up your ass man

Rela

x

don't know what to tell you, I'm longposter

it's what I do

@longposter Working on a replacement, my issue with it is it doesn't just say straight out certain thing

s

Takes too long to cover certain topics

I think it straight-out says too MUCH personally

(you're right about that though)

Anyway, your definition of fascism told and still tells me you're not well versed did you pick up the gist of the definition in any way whatsoever

And I don't mean the obligatory stoic aspect

Of le universal troof

I mean fascism itself

The worldview

I suppose that's because I've never really been very interested in fascism specifically

I don't really know what to tell you beyond the unity through strength, might is right, collective over the self mantras

this text seems to play up the indomitable will of nature aspects of fascism more than I remember Mussolini ever caring about

It's not just that, it also defines reason for these things

I see that as more radtrad

And self determined purpose

As part of these things

That one is a strong individual and can grow easily because the larger organism he is organ to is solid

And vice versa

It's not whatever ideology you just said

I've never ever heard the word radtrad before and I never want to read that again lmfao

Cringed hard lad

radical traditionalism? I apologize for the contraction, I thought it was pretty standard syntax in this hemisphere

are you familiar with Julius Evola

No the concept of radical traditionalism sounds like a meme

And if anyone self identifies as that they should kill themselves

the ground it covers isn't really much different than the stuff touted in this text