Not what comes before of after it

There are two sides to fascism: the material and immaterial

If we become complete idealists then we have no game plan

I realise entirely that no man will be able to dictate the future post-collapse, implement their ideal society

but at least with people who regard the material as something that, whilst illusory, definitely has impact on our souls, they might fight towards it with much more vigor

Yes but the balance must exist, if we become absolute pragmatists we lose the actual meaning to our struggle

“Muh strong state”

Therefore it is crucial to understand the basis of the worldview

I don't know, what will a troofer, who only knows fascism as "da troof", do for his people, as compared to a man who is similarly immersed in the material and yet knows that he must create a future for his people

It's philosophy vs. street smarts, essentially

And the age of philosopher kings is gone

Troofers are just retards who either lack the capacity to understand or haven’t gotten there yet, those capable of understanding the true message should be thought it

Do you really think we can fight a war with the division of “I’m a liberal Muh freedom” and “fuck freedom it’s against the order of nature”

Troofers can understand the worldview, that there's one truth yada yada

@stein bundle of sticks wit pointy axe is when we troof

but will never apply that to their lives

Whereas someone who lives similarly in the material aspect of fascism, without any regard for worldview, will only be able to apply it to their lives without any regard for philosophy

without any regard for *why*

Exactly so go teach the liberal and allow him to apply our worldview to his life

And therefore takes more action, which is good for their atman

Well yeah which is why I said

Instead of saying that he has no reason to learn it

I didn't say he had no reason

What I said was that I'd rather have this guy than a troofer

@terex.j Go to <#671953948818669568> and read Squire's. It's a shit book that we're coming out with a revision of soon, but it's good enough for now

<:pepeThumbsUp:528439554034761797>

@Sovereyn wait so ST is getting a revision? Nice

Yeah it's

not stellar

Some think it's good, I say they're brainlet troofers

The thing is ST is not subversive to be passed as a teen novel even (targeting the youth crowd part, not the ones published by the enemy), so it can only go so far.
If I am allowed to comment on ST, it is "it sounds like it is trying to wake the youth up, but are too forceful in the analogy department"

What the fuck

@34.Qg7＃شاه مات what is that name

Chess term

ight

Fill the <#671832099816472640>

Will get around it later

Once I have the time

👍

Ight dweeb