Message from @Wayward Lone
Discord ID: 663433199225012225
based
remove the occupation
Soleimani's death really isn't that complicated. He directly aided and supported a militant group responsible for the death of a US contractor and injuring 35 US servicemen December 27th. This was just the latest in a string of provocations, so it's surprising the media's pretending this was just some arbitrary act.
Which media? I've seen a lot justifying it.
What do you mean by "directly aided and supported"? he didn't participate in anything, nor did any Iranians. Iraqi rebels were reacting to US Zionist occupation that they do not want in their country.
Iran-backed militia attacked the US embassy.
Where are you pulling your nonsense from?
US/Israel/Saudi backed terrorists attack Iran and the rest of the Middle East lmao
ISIS.
He didn't participate in anything? Why was QS in Iraq, violating his travel ban by the UN?
You know the Iraqis have no issue with him being there right? lol
like
not just the people
Do you understand what a travel ban is?
but the government
Do you think I care what some internationalist organization thinks it can dictate to sovereign nations?
I've seen alot of that sentiment on MSNBC and CNN over the past week. Granted, nothing as damning as the Post calling Al Baghdadi an "Astute Religious Scholar". And an Iranian-backed militia group was directly responsible for the attack on the K1 military base on Dec 27, and the attack on the US Embassy on Dec 31.
Are you a globalist?
Yes, because the world operates by your rules?
my rules?
hahahahaha
Your argument for QS breaking a travel ban is because "do you think I care?"
What in the world
You tell me it as if its supposed to matter
it doesn't
It does matter
The man was taken out as a target of opportunity. It was for a variety of past provocations, least of all a travel ban
You saying it doesn't matter doesn't make it not matter
That's just stupid and childish
@Lidomite If the UN voted that Trump can't leave the US would you think it to be ridiculous and not care if he violated it or would you say that he deserves to be bombed for disobeying the UN?
Its all arbitrary.
Utterly stupid reasoning. Give me actual examples.
of what
Whatever the hell you're trying to argue.
Don't give me made-up hypotheticals.
Why, does it not fit your narrative to play them out?
Because it's not even within the realm of possibility that a POTUS will face a travel ban by the UN.
Holy shit, you'
I believe you're likely a hypocrite and would not respect a UN ruling just like I don't if it was against something you supported
You're creating fiction that just cannot ever happen in reality and presenting that as an argument.