<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

so we looked at the numbers

lel ive been watching sam hyde lately

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Tucker is a good gateway to Third Position for leftists

Then there's also Robert Putnam's study on the effects of diversity on social capital

yes this reminds me

of how leftists think that like hispanics and blacks get along

perfectly

lol

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/07/ethnic-diversity-strength-or-weakness/

> Given all this, it should come as no surprise that there is a body of research showing that racial diversity destroys social harmony. The most well-known study in this literature is Putnam (2007). Putnam, a Harvard political scientist, analyzed a set of over 40 regions across the united states and looked at how ethnic diversity related to various measures of “social capital”. He held regional differences in age, poverty, crime, and other variables, constant and found that the more ethnically diverse a region was the lower its level of social capital was. In particular, Putnam found that the more diverse a community was the less trust residents reported having in their neighbors, the less people trusted local government and media, the less people voted, the less people gave to charity, the less people worked on community projects, and the fewer friends people had. Perhaps most strikingly, people in diverse communities were less happy overall and less satisfied with their lives.

but how am i going to get tacos ford

dont you like tacos

i mean, immigrants contribute more in tax revenue than they take in government benifits, so idk why they'd be bad for our economy, but im a reasonable and sensible person, several people in this discord alone have changed my mind on things. tell me how im wrong

Economic leftists should vehemently be against mass immigration. Instead we see that they are merely the tools of Neoliberal elites against the Traditional Family and Western Civilization.

basically PT. I dont think that integration of immigrants is impossible. However I do think certain ethnicities do it easier.

But certainly uncontrolled MASS immigrations both legal and illegal in the millions is just unmanageable

especially from 3rd world countries of all places.

Any govt. should be accountable to its citizens, not foreigners, in the first place

So this hyper focus on immigration, legal or illegal, is misplaced. Foreigners don't have a right to be in America.

im mostly irish and yk its like.. my family doesnt even speak any sort of old irish/gaelic or anything like that. that wasnt kept at all. we(my family) all speak English now and identify as American and highly value the way our ancestors built something that we can benefit from. And they enshrined some of these benefits in the constitution. One in particular shall not be infringed.

ok, lets start simple, and take it from there. what do you think is the biggest problem with immigration? cause all I've heard is that you dont like them because they agree with democrats

this to me is important. far beyond like... can I get a taco bruh... yeee lit tacos brruuhhh

@PurpleToad Regarding fiscal impact, you should check this out

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/05/11/fiscal-impact-of-whites-blacks-and-hispanics/

> On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billion total and $2,795 per capita.
>
> Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a $306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.
>
> Hispanics run a budget deficit of $411.95 billion of $7,289 per capita if military spending is proportional. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites hispanics run a deficit of $291.3 billion, or $5,160 per capita.

@PurpleToad A Nation is not just a vessel for abstract ideas in a geographic territory, but a people tied by culture, history, tradition and blood. It is not merely a GDP spinning rootless corporation, inhabited by hedonist, deracinated, atomized individuals, but an extended family where the people feel they are in the same boat to pursue a greater destiny, just as the Founders intended.

so to sum up your point in a sentance, america is suffering because of brown people.

?

correct me if im wrong

not precisely. But think about this in the sense of letting more come IN from 3rd world countries that are underdeveloped. And doing this on the scale of millions of people a year. 60+ million since 1965.

now imagine the impact that has on an issue that we would already like to find a good way to resolve, and there are many ways to conceive of tackling this issue. Compounding it further is like... the last thing we should do as a country.

in fact, if you care about minorities that are already citizens in our country. Then itd make sense to not want more to come in...

@UnScottable See? The narrative is too ingrained

hmm...

Out of all the paragraphs about the positive effects of homogeneity, fiscal impact of various groups and explaining the core concept of Nationalism itself, all he took was "u h8 brown people"

see the way society is structured.. where discussing tradition and so on is the counter-culture in present day.
talking like this sounds like a siren song because they have propagandized people

the melting pot phrase and so on.

all through childhood

@PurpleToad Do you also think all races are the same in all traits?

the damn TV man. the advent of the internet has let people today get off of the carefully controlled TV set.