Pegging doesn’t get people pregnant; is that Hate Speech?

I suppose it varies by degrees

.... though thinking hard on it I can't come up with a way to be anti-gay and not a discriminatory sack of shit

Rule 4: Never trust anyone who uses the word "hate" as a noun.

... it *is* a noun

and a verb

There will always be hatred in the world, as long as there is evil. To try and eradicate "hate" is to ignore evil and not deal with the underlying problem.

that's presuming objective evil

I'm allowed to feel that you're a faggot and respect you as a person. Life is strange that way.

If there is no objective evil there's nothing wrong with hate

well, basically

can't eradicate how someone feels

no thought crimes

Yes

we can only act upon acts

So presuming that something is wrong predicates that there is an objective standard of good and evil, and that one party is in the wrong

We've all seen Minority Report

You can't deny objective evil and give any ground to what this article says

"The kids of drug addicts can tell if you're going to do the boogaloo"

I haven't read it, I'm just pointing out the headline isn't really out of line

So wait, kids with autism can predict the future?! Is that why they are always screaming because they see WW3?

The headline is pure presumption and shouldn't even have been posted here, it's clickbait

true, it does start with "your", which immediately goes into subjectivity

which is why I began my response with "that varies by degrees"

Its only aim is to pick a fight and play the victim.

not all anti-gay sentiment is homicidal, for example

People who use the word "hate" as an object noun are invariably creating more hate than they address.

I am forced to disagree. That's a silly parameter

If you're trying to tackle "hate" you're not doing anything productive, you'll just polarize people further away from you because they don't understand.

"Hate" is never given a justification, so they see the reaction to evil as a sin.

Instead of, you know, the evil itself.

I agree its a fruitless endeavor, but simply endeavoring at all isn't automatically a certain negative

its a waste of their time, but not much more unless they take it too far

Pushing a wood splinter further into your skin is not going to get rid of the splinter. You have to pull it out to remove it. There is a right and wrong way to go about dealing with an aggravating problem.

I refuse to believe you don't see how silly that comparison is

Pushing it further in may cause it to become submerged, and not drag or catch anymore, but the risk of infection is too high.

by acknowledging that "hate" as an individual concept can't be quantified or coherently adressed, you've already annulled this binary example

again, a silly comparison

Wanting to kill people is not natural default state.

No, it isn't, which was one of my points as well

If you're going to accuse someone of homicidal tendencies towards a certain group, you have to ask why.