The damage in regards to pro massive corporations and business lobbies has already been done and thebcontnue to strangle out he market for new businesses

Without something radically and quite possibly violently changing you will never have a chance to see how a freer market will perform @Sq crcl

That's just a theory

I have a much more sure proof way that needs a few hundreds of years

(not my idea though )

And what is your proof lol

Sorry, I got distracted but was going to write... Ok, so basically it's parenting

Our economy is alreay well on its way to beig dominated by a few merchant houses (corporations) acting in concert with abominable workers guilds (unions)

I don't think any kind of or amount of outside change can do anything to what's ingrained in us since childhood

The only way out of this and actually towards real evolutionary steps forward, is changing our ways starting from early childhood
But still it'll take at least 4-5 generations minimum

Better paentig will not fix an already broken economy :/

You are truly spoken

There are always consequences to prior decisions even if we have changed our ways

It's natural

Hence the necessity for new action if you ever want to undo the things that have been done

Andrew Jackson did not destroy he first Bank of the United States by lettin it continue it's monopolistic business

Yes, wise man

He took direct action via the law against the bank, which I more or less the only possible action we can take now to thwart the ever expanding corporate monopolies, direct government reform hostile to said corporations

Those kinds of actions are like green tea to a late term cancer patient

Nowadays those corporations can get their grips and influences on entire economic sectors not just nations... With the aid of corrupt politicians

Ifyouknew.jpg

Hence the quite possibly only way to save the patient is to rip out he infection root and stem

Nope because its in the genes

In EVERY race

A violent means by which to curtail the growing authoritarian powers at habd

You cannot fight fire with fire

That's how feudalism was fought

By killing all of the nobles and bankrupting all of the guilds ;3

It's not a viable route as the moral corruption is endemic and ingrained

People lost interest in horizontal enforcement, assertiveness

There isn't some tremendous force of literal evil against humanity rn lol. It's just groups of people that have too much power who are acting in their own interest while the greater people have little to show of themselves

I'm not religious lol

Soon enough we'll begin reaching pre French revolution levels of inequality in regards to land and wealth distribution

Not a treeman either lolcat.jpg ( 🐁)

If the economy is not righter and the multinationals dealt with then sooner or later there will be some kind of violent movement against them, it's only a matter of time really

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Revolutions and periodical power grabs, cyclical symptom of our pretty hUmans inhabiting the land..

No. I mean, this shit can't go on forever until we accidentally annex ourselves don't you think?!

Well government appropriates land from the citizenry all the time, it's called eminent domain

They don't even do it for the purposes of public installations all the time either, frequently it's for the sake of some corporation or another

.
We know, we need a framework but at the same time we (royal) also understand the need for operating space on the individual level.

Governments always start out small, then as time goes on they expand as much they can get away with .

If we finally really want to live in a **civilised** society, we need to be a much more *integrated* and self-productive part of our world. **Not a livestock like extension of any given local government**. /I'm talking in general/

the size of a government isnt necessarily a bad thing

the size of a government isnt necessarily a bad thing
its entirely determinant on who exactly is being a member within that government

So, until we had people who could resist the temptation of power, we shouldn't have large governments. What do you think?

not necessarily resist the temptation of power, having someone power hungry in charge isnt inherently a bad thing