and we dont have the infrastructure for mass food imports either

unlike chinkland

You're not engaging with what I'm saying, because you can't

Eh, we've got enough surplus.

not for 100 million people lul

Um... the entire US Breadbasket?

The entire Midwest?

which isnt operating at peak output you know

The wastage is that much. >.>

theyre basically closer to sustenance farmers rn

Would you be okay with a President Xi?

the government pays them to not cultivate

@Ares you cannot just vote in a state you just live on in vacation.

Hi erewan

who has the best geography

they produce enough food to keep prices relaively high in the domestic market

Would President Xi be just as American as Abraham Lincoln?

I think america has the best geography

Xi ain't even a president

@Ares that isn't even a legitimate question.

He's a chairman

We have the infrastructure for mass food imports and exports. We actually export more agriculture to China than we import from them.

Sea to shining sea helps. @𒀭𒋾𒊩𒆳

i know

because china cant grow crops for shit

@Mersenne who's the 'we' in this case?

we dont have enough infrastructure to *import* food tho

we're mostly relying on domestic produce

The United States as the net exporter in this case

we only have so many ports

when america and china hate but fundamentally rely on eachother

well

difference being

america can survive without china

71 seats I disagree

china cant survive without america

:dab:

Man, I don't know how else to spell it out. Mexico sends 100 mil people over however long. Your kids have the option between President Alejandro and President Pedro. Is that just as American as Chuck and Steve?

We might rely but "fundinental"? No lol

The US absolutely can sustain itself without China.

They make all your shit and you make all their food