Message from @halfthink
Discord ID: 670527927854563330
For all those athiests that say religion is a pervert smfh
Need a total number of people in each profession these numbers mean nothing by themselves.
Happy new years bois
Happy new years
repent, boomer
>>> But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.
Matthew 5:22 ESV
Fug. I think I've done that.
@halfthink dont worry im more than guilty myself
>>> Let me begin by discussing two possible meanings of the term conservative. The first meaning is to refer to someone as conservative who generally supports the status quo; that is, a person who wants to conserve whatever laws, rules, regulations, moral and behavioral codes happen to exist at any given point in time.
Because different laws, rules, and political institutions are in place at different times and/or different locations, what a conservative supports depends on and changes with place. and time. To be a conservative means nothing specific at all except to like the existing order, whatever that may be.
The first meaning can be discarded, then. The term conservative must have a different meaning. What it means, and possibly only can mean, is this: Conservative refers to someone who believes in the existence of a natural order, a natural state of affairs which corresponds to the nature of things: of nature and man. This natural order is and can be disturbed by accidents and anomalies: by earthquakes and hurricanes, diseases, pests, monsters and beasts, by two-headed horses or four-legged humans, cripples and idiots, and by war, conquest and tyranny. But it is not difficult to distinguish the normal from the anomaly, the essential from the accidental. A little bit of abstraction removes all the clutter and enables nearly everyone to "see" what is and what is not natural and in accordance with the nature of things. Moreover, the natural is at the same time the most enduring state of affairs. The natural order is ancient and forever the same (only anomalies and accidents undergo change), hence, it can be recognized by us everywhere and at all times.
>>> Conservative refers to someone who recognizes the old and natural through the "noise" of anomalies and accidents and who defends, supports, and helps to preserve it against the temporary and anomalous. Within the realm of the humanities, including the social sciences, a conservative recognizes families (fathers, mothers, children, grandchildren) and households based on private property and in cooperation with a community of other households as the most fundamental, natural, essential, ancient, and indispensable social units. Moreover, the family household also represents the model of the social order at large. Just as a hierarchical order exists in a family, so is there a hierarchical order within a community of families — of apprentices, servants, and masters, vassals, knights, lords, overlords, and even kings — tied together by an elaborate and intricate system of kinship relations; and of children, parents, priests, bishops, cardinals, patriarchs or popes, and finally the transcendent God. Of the two layers of authority, the earthly physical power of parents, lords, and kings is naturally subordinate and subject to control by the ultimate spiritual-intellectual authority of fathers, priests, bishops, and ultimately God.
Conservatives (or more specifically, Western Greco-Christian conservatives), if they stand for anything, stand for and want to preserve the family and the social hierarchies and layers of material as well as spiritual-intellectual authority based on and growing out of family bonds and kinship relations.
-Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Democracy: The God That Failed.
ask me why I believe in God...
Seen it, believe every ounce of it
this single sketchy geocities looking webpage describes exactly why ive always felt like there was the presence of an agenda at play by our governing overlords...
also given the proper contexts of leviticus and exodus rendering slavery either voluntary or as an out for NAP violations on the part of war criminals, there is absolutrly no conflict to be had between small government and the bible that I can imagine atm...
and one might say "humanism is the total denial of whatever false deity you believe in and n affirmation of men as it should be"
yeah because the last time a few of those *red* countries were founded on humanist "morality" nd notions of humanity being capable of absolute rationality, it totally didnt lead to the suffering and deaths of countless millions now did it?
nor did it lead to the statistics in the article, the double standards present between morally subjucated members of cultural "beourgois" demographics/sex/monetary class vs "proleteriat" demographics/sex/monetary class etc
couple that with post modernism and you have yourself one literal hell of a herd o sheep that thinks freedom must be the same as a lack of a personal convictions and objective obligations, as supposed to being able to even know what a lack of physical chains and being a real victim of real moral iniquity and tyranny feels like...
Combine that with pride, lust, envy etc. by individuals and "No King But Christ" becomes a better motto each passing day (even though im definitely a small govt guy as supposed to a no govt guy)
> > athiests: athiesm is the default position because muh unprovable epistemological viewpoint
> > science: I THINK THE F--- NOT YOU TRICK A-- B----
Any null hypothesis is necessarily false.
"Atheists don't exist" sounds a lot like what the presuppositional apologists argue, and I agree, depending on the definition.
editing pins for (literally) God's sake 😂
*(while also minding the fact that nojalt, I agree that the talmudic edomites that unironically plot against christians indirectly are about as anti christian as you can get)*
full armor bois