Message from @Enigmatic★Chromatic
Discord ID: 602674592741326858
Ergo it must recognize differentia between objects
They act according to relations in their memories yes, calling this categorization is intellectually dishonest
There is an order of magnitude difference here
Even such memories being distinct from current reality is a categorization
It's not
...
So memories are current reality?
Categorization is definitionally systematic
Nice
Well done
Applause
Categorization is not just differentiation, it requires logical systematization, that means a linguistic framing
We both agreed to the definition, no such systemacy was agreed to
What's up hegelians
You are being intellectually dishonest now
It's in the definition
It's implicit that there is systematization to categorization
It’s the verb in question regardless
The verb need not be systemic
Let me make that easier for you
Go away
I mean use words however you want, but no one will know what you mean
Fuck off
Either address me or don’t
I'm sorry you don't understand the importance of linguistics in the development of abstract thought
I’m sorry you can’t recognize how basic cognition works
But sometimes it do be like that
For someone so high and mighty on logic it's funny you've in this conversation demonstrated a lack of understanding of social construction, anthropology, linguistics and basic bitch psychology
Go away
But then again "muh a prioris"
Actually I will take that advice
Finally
Fucking hell, took you that long to listen
The best rebuttal is of course "leave me alone uwu"
Tbf we argued for over an hour I'm sure
He's probably exhausted as am I
I love McToast arguments. He comes in hard and is never wrong. He'd make a great politician.
He’s in the UK
They don’t like that there