You’ve disproven yourself

Yeah and a brain without language doesn't make categorizations

Which was my claim

Literally

It does. The cat acts

Ergo it must recognize differentia between objects

They act according to relations in their memories yes, calling this categorization is intellectually dishonest

There is an order of magnitude difference here

Even such memories being distinct from current reality is a categorization

It's not

...

So memories are current reality?

Categorization is definitionally systematic

Nice

Well done

Applause

Categorization is not just differentiation, it requires logical systematization, that means a linguistic framing

We both agreed to the definition, no such systemacy was agreed to

What's up hegelians

You are being intellectually dishonest now

It's in the definition

It's implicit that there is systematization to categorization

It’s the verb in question regardless

The verb need not be systemic

You are making a massive leap in logic here and I really am not sure if I disengage at this point

Let me make that easier for you

Go away

I mean use words however you want, but no one will know what you mean

Fuck off

Either address me or don’t

I'm sorry you don't understand the importance of linguistics in the development of abstract thought

I’m sorry you can’t recognize how basic cognition works

But sometimes it do be like that

For someone so high and mighty on logic it's funny you've in this conversation demonstrated a lack of understanding of social construction, anthropology, linguistics and basic bitch psychology

Go away

But then again "muh a prioris"

Actually I will take that advice

Finally

Fucking hell, took you that long to listen

The best rebuttal is of course "leave me alone uwu"