observe

right unveil yourself already

you're truly either a magapede retard or i'm an actual sperg

The idea that 2+2 equals 4 comes from a little amalgam of the previous knowledge of fuckboys who invented math and its basic operations.

They created a system to which everyone, if not the majority, agreed.

In a way, it can't really be explained in the sense of "we know it's like this because we conducted experiments".

It was already created the way it is.

math isn't an invention as much as it is a discovery

discovery

of laws

I'm not sure it can really be called a discovery, at least not the basic part.

numbers and symbols are inventions yes

but not math itself

Pythgoras theorem isn't an invention, it's a discovery

The first, uh... "days" of math created a base system for other people to improve on.

Like Newton's integrals.

Or was that derivatives? I dunno.

Anyway, some dude looked at a field that wasn't an exact shape and invented integrals to calculate its area.

And that was what I'd call a discovery.

what about 2+2=4?

And the base for it was the invention of those gay-ass numbers and symbols.

it wasn't invented

no

numbers and symbols are a means

bruh moment

2+2=4 was established when they created the numbers and their consequent operational symbols.

smdh

fuckin’ please, i cannot look at this channel and cringe from these fuckin’ blue-pilled kids @Sterling

So the moment they put the order as "1, 2, 3, 4", they already said 2+2=4 without even inventing the plus symbol, sort of.

Even then, it might not be clear enough, which is why schools use physical examples for kids.

don’t ever ping me again you fuckin’ mundane loser

bl0cked tbh

They bring four apples and show that if you get two apples and put them together with other two apples, you get four apples.

And kids understand that easily because they can see and grasp it, unlike a weird symbol on a paper.

but it's not an invention

it's an observation

Well, it's an observation based on the invention of these numbers and their order.

Which is why I said they "sort of" said 2+2=4 by doing the order alone.

bloodi is that conservanigger your account?

They didn't actually establish the equation with the order alone.

It was kind of a consequence.