Message from @RustyShackleford

Discord ID: 458733263226404874


2018-06-19 20:18:58 UTC  

interesting, I'm not seeing much overlap between west and eastern africa

2018-06-19 20:19:01 UTC  

hmm

2018-06-19 20:21:19 UTC  

aliens built them

2018-06-19 20:21:50 UTC  

🇼 🇺 🇿

2018-06-19 20:21:58 UTC  

🇼 🇪

2018-06-19 20:22:16 UTC  

🅰 🇱 ℹ 🇪 🇳 🇸

2018-06-19 20:22:21 UTC  

🇳

2018-06-19 20:22:41 UTC  

🇸 🇭 ℹ 🇪 🇪 🇪 ℹ 🇹

2018-06-19 20:35:31 UTC  

white nationalist is one of those words that has no meaning anymore

2018-06-19 20:36:00 UTC  

it has meaning to me

2018-06-19 20:36:01 UTC  

but yes

2018-06-19 20:36:01 UTC  

20 years ago you could point at some skinhead in Poland and say "this guys a white nationalist" but now if you have views to the right of a classic liberal you're fucked

2018-06-19 20:36:21 UTC  

they've basically ruled that anything with the word "white" is racist

2018-06-19 20:37:50 UTC  

no one calls themselves a white nationalist

2018-06-19 20:37:56 UTC  

it's a very vague word

2018-06-19 20:37:59 UTC  

term

2018-06-19 20:41:00 UTC  

pretty specific in my eyes

2018-06-19 20:41:07 UTC  

you believe whites should have a nation

2018-06-19 20:41:40 UTC  

No I mean the way it's put on people

2018-06-19 20:42:12 UTC  

I'm sure people have called Sargon it and he doesn't believe any of that

2018-06-19 20:42:38 UTC  

yeah i think they just throw it in the basket of deplorables

2018-06-19 20:45:27 UTC  

I"ve been talking about twitter being sued for a couple months now

2018-06-19 20:47:31 UTC  

yeah but today they actually ruled on his ability to sue

2018-06-19 20:47:38 UTC  

which is something i guess

2018-06-19 20:47:57 UTC  

I read the court documents

2018-06-19 20:48:01 UTC  

and the judge shat on them

2018-06-19 20:48:08 UTC  

on whom

2018-06-19 20:48:14 UTC  

twitter's lawers

2018-06-19 20:48:17 UTC  

nice

2018-06-19 20:48:18 UTC  

got a link?

2018-06-19 20:49:33 UTC  

it's long though

2018-06-19 20:51:26 UTC  

Thus, this lawsuit does not implicate Twitter’s right to regulate its public forum to prevent legitimate instances of obscenity, harassment, threats, and abuse, so long as these rules are written and enforced in a viewpoint-neutral manner. Instead, it raises the issue of whether Twitter can create an online public forum, and then once the public forum becomes near ubiquitous, arbitrarily and discriminatorily ban users from its platform due to Twitter’s disagreement with a speaker’s viewpoint, political beliefs, and perceived political affiliations.

2018-06-19 20:51:33 UTC  

this argument is the best imo

2018-06-19 20:51:39 UTC  

basically twitters lawyers were trying to use anti-slaap laws to get the lawsuit dismissed

2018-06-19 20:51:50 UTC  

and the judge told them how ridiculous it was

2018-06-19 20:52:11 UTC  

anyone else find it odd Richard Spencer is verified on twitter while plenty of other guys got banned?

2018-06-19 20:52:17 UTC  

he's a fed

2018-06-19 20:52:22 UTC  

that's what I thought