Message from @RekItRalph
Discord ID: 505544353515700241
i mean
both are pretty bad
I know you guys don’t like to think through things but complete information is important
i sure as hell wouldn't wanna go to either place
hey now
no need to insult people
those were all there were that year in afghanistan
@RekItRalph I know you like to think *we owe you respect*
You guys insult people all the time
them
yes
but you stoop to that level
be the bigger mang
But when you are simply proven wrong you act like snowflakes
assert your position with piety
Did i hurt your white man feelings. Ohhh im so sorry
i mean, its an internet argument, "prove" is a strong word
I like when people use lube to rape me with knowledge
that
was well put
It stimulates their mind
i think the fact that you accept somethings as fact so easily, might be telling in an of itself
but thats just my take
Most "normal people" accept "facts" from whoever they deem to be the approved distributer and arbiter of knowledge
^
and many people dont share the same distributor of knowledge
hence you get indiscrepencies
also that last word might not be a word, but you get what i was saying
It is now
what i'd suggest
if yall are arguing statistics comparatively between afghan and UK for terrorism
is to get multiple sources
compare, contrast
agree on a timespan that is suitable for both parties to be "convincing"
and then just go from there
just remember, if you don't have a statistics degree, you could interpret things wrong too
so theres that
numbers have a LOT of depth
I would just use the global terrorisim database
who is that funded by?