@Fitzydog he probably gets more pussy than you

and the principle of doing that has been applied to all sorts of things, but machine learning is still cutting edge and so there's a lot of new ground to cover

that's why tech companies are paying buku bucks for programmers in ML

We barely understand how real learning works in humans lol

Is there a comparison to old children stories on the line of Grimm’s Fairytales and new reworked stories and the differences of the lessons extracted?

oh you want to hear something really scary

crazy conspiracy theory time

uh oh.

One last thing: I think 'tool centric' cognition is probably the most accurate to reality

and this is only because I happen to follow so many different fields that seem to be intersecting, and so it's fun to think about it in this way but it's still just a conspiracy

I think general machine intelligence may already exist in some capacity, maybe even multiple ones, and they are driving our innovation towards the singularity

Like that Goetzel guy? lol

The singularity is debunked

He's Machine controlled opposition

because there are a lot of perfect conditions lining up where, if you look back on how technology developed, you start to think "whoah, what are the odds of that"

I think you're retconning technology

for example, a lot of neural networking tech wouldn't be possible today if it weren't for video games

also, bitcoin is involved in this as well

'Perfect'. Gice me fusion power and I will bwlieve whatever you want.

because the proliferation of parallel processing came from an arms race between graphics card developers

So what you are saying is.

Gamers made the modern world.

I think you're looking back on tech, and seeing the development process as 'perfect' for what it led us to, not being able to comprehend other paths that we may not even be aware are currently possible

This is known.

not only that, but the models for constructing AI and testing it has really come from those proto-AIs interating with human players in those games

@Fitzydog maybe, it's just a fun conspiracy theory

Yeah, kind of like the Joe Rogan 'cocoon theory' lol

But without video games, I don't see what industry would have spurred the proliferation of parallel processing

Look if we honestly did accidentally figure out AI, we made it too retarded to be viable. We can't even figure out why WE are intelligent.

It wouldn't have happened nearly as quickly through scientific pursuits

It was probably all inevitable

Everything is.

but that's just one example

What will happen, will happen.

Well, anyways, the one on one discussion was good, but I g2g

there's also a lot of interesting new things being developed in the next iteration of programming languages, which have marketed individual uses, but combined have a lot of utility towards machine learning models outside of the current generation of neural networks

so it's going to be very interesting to see where that goes

Fitzy is hungry for more trap cock

Machine learning is sort of shit though.

It's impressive at first I think.

Yes! Which is why it's all so exciting, because there's so much potential work to be done

But then you realize... Oh. It's just luck of the draw over and over again.

No a lot of predictive models are very successful