I agree boniface. "I still believe that not considering the social aspect of humans as a very strong and influential aspect of human formation and interaction is a grave mistake of those who are too deep into the biological materialism.

Socialisation is an emergent property in humans from our genetics

HOWEVER

they serve to inform us of threats in the environment

BUT

we can be given false signals from others for nefarious purposes

and some of us react in ways like rejecting in group preference

hmm.. I just thought of something regarding rejection of in group preference.

Could it be that its due to a mouse-utopia type phenomenon? Life gets so easy, people get so numb to it that they rebel against the very thing making it good?

So neglecting the biologically rooted properties of the social aspect in humans can lead to the ignorance of it's vital and deeply influential role it plays.

in other words, human beings can't handle having nice things lol

#1 we aren't mice

no, i don't think it's that things tget too nice

#2 that environment was highly controlled and unlike the real world

I think it's that we slack up

and then it escalates

some people make some mistakes that then unravel

they tried to test it in the city with humans but the same result could not be reproduced

which is why I think you need to be extremely strict as long as possible

it's all about leadership imo

it seems like the results are happening society wide as we speak though

but I will say that it gave example to a truth about life and evolution

look

comfort and ease breeds weakness and retardation

if the leadership in europe was like "no, no more immigration", then it would stop

and the opposite well the opposite

if they said "we need to teach evolutionary reality" then things would change

it's from the top down

not the other way

generally yes

its worth a shot Banjod

of course you have revolution, but what's worth a shot is becoming the elite..

Until revolution time, problem is, right wing revolutions are like 1/10th as common as left wing revolutions

why is it better to become the elite than revolution? (obviously the direct harm)

you don't need to rely on others

or very few

yup

immediate power

with the masses you have to get on board with a view

then on board with solution

then into action