It is only able to exist because there is no concrete definition of a pile of sand.

get more studies

lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox

that's what I'm saying

right now there's no evidence

If you have a clear definition of a "pile of sand", you can't have this paradox.

so its about 99.99% speculation

It is, as a result, just a confirmation of Wittgenstein's critique of philosophy: it's all just linguistic confusion.

A pile of sand is two or more grains. 😎

The question being asked is categorically incorrect.

Paradox solved.

Really, you are telling me in a way that I am interpreting the data in correctly with false premises. I wonder if they even have a study that fulfill your conditions for evidence.

"Does intelligence scale with extraversion?" is incorrect as a *question* unless you have a concrete and workable definition of intelligence.

@Slavic Infidel based and empiricistpilled

And no.

(and of extraversion)

You can interpret all you like out of my argument, but the essence of it is this:

You have to get a clear and reliable definition of the traits being evaluated.

Or you get the "IQ tests only measure your ability to take IQ tests" problem.

If you think I'm just having a dab on you, I haven'teven broken out the epistemology

holy, getting a study, might as well one that meets your conditions is hard. I will keep looking.

I have a pretty high verbal IQ but a pretty low typing IQ and a pretty medium smoke signal IQ.

By the way, have you ever heard of a guy named "Biker"? @Slavic Infidel

He used to have a pfp like yours, with the same guy.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222513582_Extraversion_and_intelligence_A_meta-analytic_investigation

I briefly saw someone with the same pfp as me some time ago but didn't interact.

this is what I found

and it says

basically

the effect was a very tiny positive

that turned into a very tiny negative

```Correlations between the date of publication of the study and the observed extraversion–intelligence correlations were generally negative, which suggested a change in the magnitude of the extraversion–intelligence relation over time. Furthermore, the estimated effect size between extraversion and intelligence for studies conducted in the year 2000 and later was (p < .05), indicating that not only has the magnitude of the correlation decreased, but also that the direction of the correlation has changed from positive to slightly negative.```

yeah

which tells me pretty much nothing

other than that the relationship is not well understood

and is probably insignificant

at least according to the present evidence

it implies that the findings of correlation between the two traits are circumstantial

rather than profound

Sorry, got distracted. Looking at how Aryan the Spanish royal family is.