you're crossing way too many bridges

We have too many drug addicts so we ought to make the substances they abuse more easily accessible and this will resolve the issue

>he wants to live in a society

lol!

Nothing worked in Portugal, nor Canada, where these kinds of policies have been implemented

Prohibition makes drugs more potent. It actively creates more addicts, who will go onto to commit property crimes to feed their addictions. This is also the main incentive for private actors to exclude addicts.

the thing you don't understand is

even if tyou started with a perfect population

you need extreme laws to not degenerate

there is less drug use under prohibition than without it

every time

humans will be humans.

>nothing worked

also, not all prohibitions are similar cases

>didn't try abolishing welfare

ok

let's "try it"

oh, we can't?

@Banjod How are property rights not enough? It's literally a net loss to keep addicts around.

no we can't

too many parasites

so it' not a solution

you desperately want it to work out that prohibition does EVERYTHING worse, that there will be MORE people on drugs under prohibition

its clownish

stop paying taxes

it's your duty

Again, read The Economics of Prohibition.

it' not enough because things are not static

have you read locke?

no, I don't think I will

have yo?

its nonsensical, and has never been the case in any prohibition that I know of

Why not? It's probably better researched than any argument I'll ever make. And discord isn't the place for debates, anyway.

I have no need to

@Nerthulas You've never read it, how can you say it's nonsensical?

I know alcohol use was reduced under prohibition

I'm not saying it is

I'm saying you are

Read the book.