Message from @Leaf
Discord ID: 636562685189685298
it was good for colonization
The family unit wasn't organised like that during the colonial era lol
yeah it was
No
that family structure goes way back in northern europe
it's from kaisers new servfer
the tradition of man leaving home and making new home with wife
that what i meant
well good for him if its working lol
My dad's side of the family is all English Protestant and I barely know any of them but my mother's is Catholic and I know even the most distant relatives better than my 2nd degree relatives on my father's side
This is why I identify so strongly with Catholicism btw and also with my mom's side of the family
like who
except the obvious yes
Anglo Prot family = <:dumpsterfire:560131482581205052>
emotional, lovey dovey people are inferior
Anglos are inferior
jews are emotional
damn must be small
anglos are EXILED JEWS not even the jews like them
i'm half joking
angloid cope is autism cope
but not completely joking
A family that cooperates in labour and business and cultural affairs produces xenophobic, strong people
Actually I would say the Anglo familial arrangement in recent decades is why it was so easy for Jews to subvert them
but whatever is making the anglos weak today, did some of that make them strong in the past?
so are whatever things we are talking about always about or just sometimes bad
No, their ancestors were totally different and superior people
nah
By every metric
i mean, yes and no
some things changed, others stayed the same
In character, physique, lifestyle, diet, beliefs, etc; the Anglos of previous generations were incredibly superior
family structure has been well-studied and differed substantially across europe
its probably not the genetics...
there have been wars before
mass depopulations
its probably the culture and economy