@troglodytes where

I'm convinced

the difference is the want of the person existing

why are they saying it

nope

not at all

<:kekboi:417880491182653450>

I'm convinced with historical reference

totally rational

Hannibal had no contemporary scholar record him. That is the big one I can think of off the top of my head. Yet, we assume he existed from antedotal evidence. We have historic records of Christ.

I am also very rational.

were greeks blonde, eternal?

Only a smallfrequency

Well lets go by what evidence there is

greeks were olive skinned

always

what do you have banjod?

I meant small

yes or no question

JA

NEIN

DNA or lack of and just historical refference?

It is 4:30 in the morning. But yes, there are a small frequency in blonde greeks.

DNA EVIDENCE DOES NOT EXIST PAST 500 YEARS

RETARD

let me be more clear

corpses with blonde hair

@troglodytes why is mixing data bad.

if that's doesn't exist then we defer to historical reference

more room for weaseling

What does that even mean

dude

think about wtf are you are sayin

you're talking about a fking magic jew

it's absurd

and you should be shamed

great argument oh great banjod

it is

Nah