lol

you have shitted yourself online

you're a joke if you think you've made a good point

when a simple quesiton breaks you

they have no proof for the existence of god

unless they abstract him so far that they basically become what they consider atheist

nature worshippers

you pointed out why what I said seems irrational, then I simply pointed out jesus wasn't magical

which is the correct way imo

and didn't exist in this sense, so why, is the real quesiton

if you're gonna discuss this, at least level with reality

Banjod

we aren't having the same discussion anymore

we are, we are talking about wheter he existed

and you pointed to documents

I heard that @troglodytes opinion comes just out of his hate of Jews and is not rational. 🤷

these documents may not even be talking about the same person

"why would they write them", and I answered, yes, why would they, he wasn't magical, so why do it..

he's been quite insignificant at the time

later scriptwriters blew him up

I'm convinced that he did. Not saying he didn't. Your convinced he didn't based on some argument of magical involvement. well when talking about other historical figures why does magic never enter the narrative of his existence?

the reasons for writing them doesn't align with reality

deepened his lore

that's theproblem with using them

why doesn't magic enter, because they didn't claim to be the son of god

ahhh

@Eternal Entropy get some sleep. this convo is not going anywhere.

see now

because other figures didnt use magic

nothing left to say

or have magic powers

@Hector yea I gotta wage cuck 2morrow

lol

>can't be up all night discussing the existence of christ

lol

genualy funny

but spend whole life as christian

and for the record, I'm not a christian

ok muhammed

i will never have to wage cuck in my life if i get married