Message from @JCDenton
Discord ID: 643261458511036420
Not any different
but you can never observe everything
its related to entropy
or have universal knowledge
That doesn't mean the universe is ultimately relative
I wouldn't say that either
it's mechanistic
has rules but things change as you go down
and speed up
etc
@Eternal Entropy i was advertising this livestream i cam across, there is supposed to be a sparring match
relative
Quantum Mechanics says that a quantum system will evolve deterministically. But if you interact with it at a different angle it can appear to be an entirely different system.
ok thanks denton
one guy just threw a roman to the moon
yea imagine constilation orion from another point in the milky way
That doesn't necessitate radical relativism
won't be the same at all
Though that's how it's used
Take it to the moral domain
You can't say 4 yo trans is wrong
Because you can start from w/e axiom and justify it
basically interacting at a different angle transforms it into a slightly different quantum system with a different basis vectors
That's the problem
you just can't know everthing at once
well.... so many things are relative... even the weak mixing angle changes with momentum of the observer.
I get all that
but you can get snippets of time,
But it's a problem
location or speed
old shit
did you know neutrinos dont have a definite mass?
they exist simultaneously as a superposition of different masses
If you say it's all relative and therefore one set of axioms as just as "valid" as another the you are to might makes right
a lot of things you think are cut and dry arent so simple
So you either need to make that explicit and let's just have huge war
Or you need to refute it and point to actual solidity
i started as an objectivist like you