no it will be erased

in time

By smarter people by us

Let's also not forget that Constantinople had most importance of any patriarchate, even over Rome, from the 4th century

I speak these words as from the pen of baha u llah

because the
>holy
>Roman
>empire
degraded into memehood

who spoke in this time of speaking in inevitable terms

there was also no papal infallibility until the concept was invented after the schism

yes

YUS

It's all added by the minds of men who seek power

and brouht satan in

Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona. For flesh and blood hast not revealed this to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. And I say to thee, thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death [gates of hell] shall not prevail against it. I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt bindon earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Oh nono found it

papal infallibility is just bullshit

<:smugooze:398100987866251265>

amen

BLESSED ART THOU INDEED

just a old man in a cone hat

Rome literally never had any glimmer of authority over any other Patriarchate, unlike it did after the Schism. So to say that this is the way it has always been and that it is true is flat out nonsense

It does tho

Antioch patriarcate

But allows them to do whatever

@blanc I've already told you. Matthew 18:15-18

read it

Like priest marriages

Yea yea

Equals

its good to respect holy men but only holy men that are holy

But what i put gives peter further power

Peter was not the only one allowed to "bind and loose"

No it does not

that's malarky

just saying it does not does not make it so

Does Paul correcting Peter give Paul further power?

like there is good buhdist monks that fallow the code

Did they get the keys of heaven or the title of foundation of the church

Oh no

but there asshat ones too

Paul is alright

just like priests

Does James deciding the Council of Jerusalem give James more power?