Message from @Trommm
Discord ID: 644787726507311104
Premises and evolution ---> definition
I find this approach to be the more convincing and novel.
You work to the definition, instead of working from it.
ok, so you've said two things thusfar, you've said that A. the second is better at convincing people than the first, and you've said that B. you no longer use the term Race, or try to argue for that term
I can get behind A, but B is bad
I did not mean I do not use it at all.
@esotericpazuzuism i fuck u in
I just don't start there.
<:FreePepe:294874238928814081>
<:greta:639980991775113227>
I use a functional definition of race.
HOW DARE YOU
Because I can
One that is develop by narrative and evolutionary proces.
how about a placeholder definition of race?
I think you can win 10/10 times, but I do not see you convincing your biased opponents as often.
generally certian biases are ideologically supremicist in nature
@wakandanwarrior is a black girl who loves nick fuentes
on twitter
✝️
tromm will rot in hell
I'm rotting on earth.
Like the molecular geneticist I was talking about. Once I started using a functional definition of race, he started to push back. He started giving and giving. I was about to finish him off before I had to vc with a friend.
ok I see what you're saying
I thought you were saying something different
<:Yes:639977935209627658>
don't think I don't know what this means
My bad for the bad explanation. I am interested in engineering good arguments that even Some biased people will give in for.
I was about to defeat him.
that's a good thing to be interested in
lol
"the 'rope' along with the 'stick' are two of mankind's oldest tools. the stick to keep the bad away, the rope used to bring the good towards us. they were our fist friends, of our own invention. wherever there were people, there were the rope and the stick." ABSOLUTELY GAEDE-PILLED
I don't have the energy or the cognizance to do that right now
unfortunately
we need to decolonize science NOW!





