Message from @Eternal Entropy

Discord ID: 645523511707697152


2019-11-17 07:10:00 UTC  

I think

2019-11-17 07:10:05 UTC  

I don't know what his deal is

2019-11-17 07:12:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/645521537264517160/-.jpg

2019-11-17 07:12:27 UTC  

Billy Ray's ideal black woman?

2019-11-17 07:13:17 UTC  

<:yay:638817157840502815>

2019-11-17 07:13:22 UTC  

<:comfy:639985510785351680>

2019-11-17 07:15:12 UTC  

🔥

2019-11-17 07:15:17 UTC  

that looks bad

2019-11-17 07:15:19 UTC  

what I mean is

2019-11-17 07:15:23 UTC  

<:comfy:639985510785351680> 🔥

2019-11-17 07:16:01 UTC  

<:TheFireRise:587174538995826700>

2019-11-17 07:18:49 UTC  

is ancap synonymous with racemixing?

2019-11-17 07:18:52 UTC  

no

2019-11-17 07:19:00 UTC  

don't lie to me, boy

2019-11-17 07:19:18 UTC  

if you want to look at a 'conservative' ancap look at Hoppe

2019-11-17 07:19:33 UTC  

It simply allows for it

2019-11-17 07:19:34 UTC  

hoppe already is mixed race

2019-11-17 07:19:39 UTC  

🤔

2019-11-17 07:19:42 UTC  

<:pinothink:401744526915534858>

2019-11-17 07:19:50 UTC  

ancaps allow just about everything

2019-11-17 07:19:58 UTC  

Just follow NAP NERD

2019-11-17 07:20:23 UTC  

even then not always

2019-11-17 07:20:23 UTC  

how about human-cat hybrids?
does AnCap allow that?

2019-11-17 07:20:29 UTC  

come to think about it

2019-11-17 07:20:44 UTC  

it means you can have your own society

2019-11-17 07:20:49 UTC  

and keep racemixing out of it

2019-11-17 07:20:59 UTC  

because people can have to agree to not racemix to join the society

2019-11-17 07:21:02 UTC  

no

2019-11-17 07:21:03 UTC  

anarchism basically forbids what

2019-11-17 07:21:05 UTC  

nothibg

2019-11-17 07:21:08 UTC  

ancaps are pro racemixing

2019-11-17 07:21:12 UTC  

...

2019-11-17 07:21:47 UTC  

The opposite is ok if it's not explicitly borbidden

2019-11-17 07:21:59 UTC  

no

2019-11-17 07:22:05 UTC  

it's not that they just allow it

2019-11-17 07:22:08 UTC  

it's that they're for it

2019-11-17 07:22:15 UTC  

I don't believe so

2019-11-17 07:22:23 UTC  

not on the philosophical level

2019-11-17 07:22:27 UTC  

they shouldn't be

2019-11-17 07:22:34 UTC  

no, they're not "for" anything,
they're just not against anything