For example, genetic engineering to improve the people of the nation should be promoted

if you have the correct world view

A strong race is a strong nation

@Owen Benjamin what exactly do you mean by genetic engineering?

artificial genes?

My religion teaches this, that science and religion are 2 wings of a bird with which mankind advances spiritually and materially

no disavowals of uncle joe being beaten to death. just that hbe's not a rabid dog <:laughsinfrench:396535844934123523>

materialism without religion is chaos and death

@Epic Style Weeding out genetic diseases, increasing intelligence etc

@Owen Benjamin so eugenics?

or actual genetic modification?

religion without science is dogmatic mechanistic hell

Luther > his retarded ass critics

so you see I hope both are a necessity

Luther be like: sola scriptura btw I'm gonna remove a bunch of scriptura

and are only bad when alone in their extremes

@Epic Style Both. But obviously, the potential negative ramifications should be taken into account. I am not for forced sterilization or any of that though.

ewwwwww transhumanism

ewwwwwwww

EWWWWWWWWWWWW

I'm totally on board with eugenics

but GM is just futurist autism imo

Who trans H here?

that's the one thing I really agree with Evola in his criticism of NS

it is inherently materialistic and futuristic

I don't like that at all

futuristic is an idealism of advancing

I'm fine withthat

but pure materialism I am not

that's why our birth rates are low

I'm much more of a traditionalist than a futurist

in many ways I am even a primitivist. Just not on the same level as others

there are ways forward without being pozzed

I am a soft futurist. Not some crazy transhumanist lol

with very heavy eugenics with blacks, how much would we be capable of improving them in terms of making them into whites within 3 generations?

by decreasing their melanin levels

because that's all race is

just melanin levels

nothing else