it's unsolvable in German, because "Apfel" and "Ananas" both start with a

but i could probably do it with real fruits

Your riddle looks like a slot machine

it's not 1,2 and 3

i did my part

the answer has to be either "Pi" or "fruit salad"

i like to start by replacing the fruits with nuts, it's easier that way because nuts are smaller and don't go bad

@johny1846 no

<:zoomer:639984566752509954>

Because it can be

Be multiple answers

Jomon vc yayoi skulls

Ainu chap:

@Angry. based

VC

Soon yes

Din ne🅱️er

Baserat

🅱️aserat

@BasedChris god and you say you are part of the superior race mate

you cant solve this

you arent in the 5%

Johny

If we assume that they are all whole numbers

Then it must be some combination of 1, 1 and 2

So

you sure

But that isn’t necessarily the case

That is

Assuming if they are whole numbers

noculation Theory of Resistance to Influence

At the core of inoculation theory (McGuire, 1961a,b) is a biological metaphor. McGuire (1964) suggested that attitudes could be inoculated against persuasive attacks in much the same way that one's immune system can be inoculated against viral attacks. In medical immunization, weakened forms of viruses are injected into the body, and the body then reacts to this injection (e.g., through cell adaptation), protecting the body from future attacks from stronger versions of that virus. McGuire (1964) contended that by exposing individuals to a persuasive message that contains weakened arguments against an established attitude (e.g., a two-sided message, or a message that presents both counterarguments and refutations of those counterarguments), individuals would develop resistance against stronger, future persuasive attacks.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00122/full

there are a infinite amount of whole positive numbers

@esotericpazuzuism migrants

For example, an inoculation message designed to discourage teen cigarette smoking (e.g., Pfau et al., 1992) might begin with a warning that peer pressure will strongly challenge their negative attitudes toward smoking, then follow this forewarning with a handful of potential counterarguments they might face from their peers (e.g., “Smoking isn't really bad for you”) followed by refutations of these counterarguments (e.g., “Actually, smoking is harmful in a number of ways…”). This inoculation format can be adapted to a number of issues, so long as (1) the intended attitude or position is already in place with message recipients, and (2) message designers are aware of some counterarguments that might be employed in attack messages in order to provide weakened, or refuted, counterarguments in the inoculation treatment message (see Ivanov, 2012, for more information on message design).

@johny1846 yes

As I said

But