no, they mention his son

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rCQ79JGrUQ

since the actual Jesus was some sort of pagan deity

seems like they mixed the Nazarene with Barabas

he was probably heir to the local (hasmonean) throne

and created Biblical Jesus

hence being called Messiah

Boi the tippercoaster still continues

=king

well the NT goes out of its way to contrast Barabas with Jesus

as a sort of literary ploy

there are no divine connotations to messiah in ancient hebrew

but apparently Barabas was also called Jesus

indeed

also the term Nazarene has nothing to do with Nazareth

some of the bible contains historically accurate figures

it is basically historically fiction

and if you look into the language (ancient hebrew) it tells you a lot more

like Mary was his wife

yes Mary Magdalene

and Jesus the Nazarene

she was the only person allowed to annoint his feet with the sacred oil of kings

which is retconned to be places like Nazareth and Magdala

but are actually titles

the Nazarene and the Magdalene

local pagan deities

which they combined with Barabas to be the Jesus in the Bible

imo

as I said, the crucifixion was a plot, to throw the romans off the scent of the dissidents and establish the release of the future heir

nothing more

just plain old politics 😂

the Talmud refers to a guy who was cornered in a woods and hanged

along with his 8 followers

all the fantastical things begin to happen after the first records of the era were translated from ancient hebrew to greek and back into hebrew

the 12 apostles are Jewish number games

Guys, is Tucker on our side?

obviously 12 refers to cosmology

Lol

Kinda

Hes still stuck in the Equalitarian frame