Message from @Trommm
Discord ID: 653601132182241282
which is a decent strategy
Men can have hundreds of thousands of babies.
if you fk their women, you ruin them, and they usually end up with 1 child
nobody has 40 children in their lifetime
be practical
^
I have 17 children
I'm using the maximum potential numbers so we don't have to argue about numbers again.
that's a bad joke btw
If a woman realistically only has 3 children, then they should all be white.
There is no limit to the number of children a man has.
But it's meaningless to use them. Most people won't have more than 10 kids, so your logic applies to white wahmen too
but your logic only works if everybody has the maximum amount of children they possibly could
^
@Trommm men and women should pair up
casual sex is degenerate
I agree.
so if women on average have 3 children, so should men
so your logic that men "can have more" doesn't work
unless you advocate for degeneracy
I think Fugeur was wrong for marrying an Asian woman and committing to exclusivity with her. Not for fucking her or getting her pregnant.
So you are for polyamory?
For men, yes.
degenerate
Polygamy.
The Mormons are right. Have as many wives as you want.
That could lead to many marriages with some wifes breaking up, harming a lot of kids
Muslims do it, Mormons did it. It's been common practice throughout history. Monogamy is a new invention. I like it, but you can only do it in certain contexts.
Natural state of things is 1 man with 17 women.
speaking of logical fallacies
thats an appeal to nature
So your argument is an appeal to nature fallacy?
lmaooo
lol
eyyyy
Good luck getting 17 wives btw
Trommm wouldn't even be able to explain why he wants his race to succeed, because he's a secularist. It'll just be an appeal to nature at the end of the day, without any spiritual or metaphysical foundation.
My goal is not 17 wives. I'm illustrating my point.
That's why his philosophy can be whatever he wants it to be
@Epic Style You're going to explain why you want your race to succeed with a religious text?
Go ahead.