and I know you don't operate by it

everything has to be put to the absolute subjective

but that is not what honestly looks like

I'll say this in defense of banjod's perception and pov.
If taken literally and with a singular lense of materialistic inquiry and then compared to what we know today...
It reads like a wise yet completely insane man wrote 3-4 books with 4 separate personalities and then just mixed em up into one book.

Sure, that's a coherent materialistic view of it. But you don't have to be a materialist.

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

But with a specific lense of perception it can be read in ways that it's not viewed as such.

chad reality vs virgin delusion

god help you

everything you say I must reply with "<:steflol:561214382181318656>" because I am laughing as you can see you guys

h-heh

<:impotentrage:552803856535257090>

ha, haha

I'm totally laughing irl guise

i was

I am actually

<:impotentrage:552803856535257090>

LAUGHING

😄

I'm always

raughing

😂

guys cant you see

I am laughing at you

😄

stay salty

this is so funny I am legit laughing guys

stay retarded

is this about the age of the earth?

go pray to not be gey

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

lmfao

we cna prove this with atom decay

@ghj Ultimately, it's about the unreality of the past.

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

<:pepelaugh:640412982119235596>

<:pepekek:649611550809653248>

what the hell does that mean

imagine

the past is real