If domination happens, then the reigning type will eventually differentiate according to locale, and then the struggle between superior strains of the previously dominant resumes.

except the most arrogant people on earth are anglos

humbly having gay lesbian priests and marrying off homos

Orthodoxy > > > POWER GAP > > > Catholicism = Protestantism

thats called being proud

and you're just jelly

@Eternal Entropy I think it's natural and therefore at least harmless and more workable.

Omninationalism is conflicted and I think it's self-defeating.

Prots thought they could just break away with no long term consequences

oh yeah Orthodoxy's so great they evangelized... who exactly?

the consequences have been profoundly negative

Largely thanks to the organic theory of state, which I've never seen to be incorrect

Russia, that's it

harmless?

If a country doesn't grow, it stagnates and dies, as any organism.

nerthoid that was 1000% angloid of you to say

lol

<:mlady:389497741769703424>

Because that's what it is. A complex organism. Like you and me are made out of cells, nations are made of humans.

that's not overly simplistic you think?

seethign catholic? @Daddy

@Nerthulas appeal to popularity

on this last point I agree

There is more nuance to it, but I've just essentialized the core concepts.

protestants created better culture

and societies

There's more to it.

than catholics

But it'snot central.

Ah yes England and Northern Europe

not pozzed at all

it's better 10 people know the truth than 1 billion heretics

✨ <:kraut:389881471881576448> ✨

well I would argue that imperialism is not on the table

As for harmless, I mean in the grand scale of things. Natural law has bettered humanity and allowed it to survive.

no, I'm saying look at the civilizations that the Orthodox vs the Catholic world produced

Even degenerate Meds know better than northern europeans

so it's a rather useless idea

Continuing to follow along it will at the very least not kill us.

But resisting natural law oftentimes does kill.

Where did the renaissance begin again?