Need back in
legitimacy is not necessary
what
Without it
a state is powerless
Wrong bird maybe
My bad
probably
It needs it
no, it is just a tyrant
A state is a hierarchical system, but not the only one
Boogaloo incoming. Buckingham County sheriff said he will tell his underlings to block gun confiscation
Hierarchy will always exist
Big guns are legitamacy. simple
The question becomes on which criteria it shall be organized
I kill you if you disagree
lol
Than I kill you
that's how power works
Michael Jackson knew
remember seth rich
end up in Hobbesian World
legitimacy usually is involved in some degree
Where we are all dead
no that's a violation of NAP bro
I don't follow it
but i can think if examples where the state was not very legitimate
but you do
but people couldn't stop it
and you iz ded
Who says the state follows the NAP
no the lolberts say this
Violators of the NAP lose its protection ofc
which you seem to be defending
the state is the NAP in practice
Defending who
The state has monopoly of legitimate aggression
the lolbert position as a rational option
Its rational
<:steflol:561214382181318656>
so every one else is under non aggression in theory
