feminism, marxism, comunism v. capitalist dichotomy

Is it cannot be onesided

Or it will destroy itself

there is one interpretation of NAP

jews love the NAP

I'm a sovereingtarian, testimonialist, market-fascism, i dunno, other than Propertarian there's not a good label. And there's no single form of government for all peoples

that actually statism is one way NAP

But too much emphasis is put on Gov't anyways in most regards. This is a moral question imo and would be addressed by their complete intolerance of a wise and spiritual people. Legislation in this case would be needed by ignorant and brainwashed populaces

You towards the state

is NAP

State towards you is no NAP

<:big_brained:396156349676781569>

So the NAP is useless, yeah, I get it

No

It must be 2 sided

Or you get statism

@Ozpin88 How the fuck are you a propertarian yet you're shitting on ancaps for half an hour

<:pepelaugh:640412982119235596>

I want statism

Propertarians aren't ancaps

I mean

its fine when you rule

But 99.9% of the time you wont

And when that spear, arrow hits your face

that's just a you problem

You cannot conplain

I don't want to rule

I view these things strictly in third-person

third person is detaxhed

If I can't rule, or if I am ruled, that's a different matter

I want my beliefs and system to rule which is something else

It could be done

More localized

get your beliefs to rule over you

become an ancap

"We can defend our commons with less proxies of violence" Ok good luck I guess

Under the state everyone in a huge swathe of territory gets forced

Kek theres violence

force is good

Its just aimed at Them