it's been this story

where as on the other hand I can't find any evidence that Jesus was real

over and over

and over

But they werent supposed to kek

and the New Testament is not accurate at all

no..they didnt go back to polytheism..
that is just an explaination

it gets so many things wrong that it is laughable

Whats wrong

lots of historical facts which are wrong

Liie wat

in the gospels

Moses gets his connection with God from mount sina..

everything is just an explination

The exact provincial borders?

yes and the bush

it gives wrong dates for the priesthood of Kaiphas

sorry

muh dates

it gives wrong dates for the rule of the Herodian dynasty

abraham

By how much

moses the 15

its an polytheistic myth found in all of middle east..

no 10

comans

it claims that Nazareth was a town in Galilee

How much be the error

Nazareth didn't even exist until like the 4th century

the religion in the middle east
is the same as in mykene

Maybe a new Nazareth

it claims that Emperor Augustus did an empire wide census

Moses = King Minos of Crete = King Menes in Egypt = Sargon of Akkad.

when he actually only did a census in Judea

<:sargone:576555026722586635>

then it gives wrong dates for that as well

Sargon of Akkad = Carl Benjamin

other claims I don't even remember

All bow down

your interests and disdain of the bibles I can't figure out which is greater among many here

The new tastemant is not supported by Roman soruces