Message from @stem
Discord ID: 661175570461360128
no
oh, so it's just leftist shit
This discussion needs to happen face to face so people can't throw insults instead of argue.
you don't even try to understand
of course it doesn't want what we want...
no
why *would* I try to understand this shit?
stem you simply should not be drawing any conclusions
what you should do is read source material
if you have any real interest
if not, don't bother
The phrase "New world order" in the Baháʼí Faith refers to the replacement of the collective political norms and values of the 19th century with a new system of worldwide governance that incorporates the Baháʼí ideals of unity and justice for all nations, races, creeds, and classes. The idea of world unification, both politically and spiritually, is at the heart of Baháʼí teachings.[1][2]
How much material is there?
we seek that all have a nation and home
'pls pay attention to my obscure cult'
>makes a cursory examination
>its exactly what you thought it was, plus its against racism
'no u don't understand u need to read this big tome'
<:really:640412966008913940>
Tromm welll
it's alot
3 main figures
lol
of course
each wrote 6x the bible and old testament combinede
easy right?
So you can't be a supporter of expansionist nationalism and bahai?:(
it's obvious all vague high-minded rhetoric
meaningless
practically
"unity and justice"
pestering people to pay attention to this random little cult, and when they do, its nono u don't understand you need to pay MORE attention
there is no "humanity"
that could mean a lot of things
imagine falling for a religion that was made after the typewriter and even the facsimile.
Christians have narrowed their core principles into concise little tracts that they can pass out on business cards. They don't require new converts to understand the whole Bible.
keeping different races does not sound likely
yes that's the topical goals in 1 liners
there's no we
easy to judge
the actual plans and reasoning
well that's for those who want to know it
bahai'ism is clearly a farce just based on how recently it was `invented`.