Message from @Fellow Comrade
Discord ID: 661184067596976159
he's not a prphet
and you say your views won't be considered schismatic
😂
it might have been introduced to the us in 1893 but it was invented in 1844. it's basically younger than 2 grandmothers. such a sproutling of a religion. there's no reason to take on such a new religion.
they haven't been and since he's not authoriattive his views are not doctrine
so, you don't have a religion, you have a ***schismatic minority interpretation*** of a tiny recent religion
that's the difference
wow so impressive
there are no schisms
a couple tried
and they fizzled out long ago
never got off the ground
probably because it's too irrelevant and silly to care enough about to try and reform
ah, so you're not schismatic against the faith of this person, who considers interracial marriage to be a moral thing
I see
well that explains a lot
abdulism is not a thing nerth
try and imagine when humans were identifiable as actual humans. so like hundreds of thousands of years ago. and we are to assume that some new age crap from an ex- Shi'ite less than 200 years ago is the be-all and end-all.
lol
this is the most blatant cope I've seen all day
THE ONLY RELIGION THAT ENCOURAGES INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE
LMFAO
I literally gave you the direct amnswers on how and why it's not correct to take non authortative views as a baha'i beleif or principle
cooooooooooope
but you don't wanna understand
so I can't fix the gap in your broken cognition
lol, no I won't try to sort our your copious coping pilpul
<:pepekek:649611550809653248>
yea see those last parts
well stop being authoritative and be submissive. plz.
those are just insults in ignorance
you ignore
thus ignorant
had that been the prophet and written into law
***I***? ignore? Yet you want to champion this faith as THE answer to White Nationalist struggle while the son of the prophet of this faith advocated miscegenation as a ***moral action***?
I would totally concede
and you would be right
but they aren't