:D

monarchy is unstable

and subject to regime change

Republics are any different?

limited suffrage democracy

is more sustainable

How many countries have attempted republic and massively failed

Democuckery is big gay

how many countries have attempted to ensure every single voter have served in the military and are faithful to religion

its isn't a democracy tbh

England tried republic and ended up with hereditary military dictatorship

aristocracy would be a better term

basically

only the best could vote

Heredity is a tried and tested system that lasted several millennia

Even early republics had hereditary institutions

yeah, and is completely dead in the 21st century

Fuck the 21st century

put it this way

The whole point of LC is return to traditionalism

Coming up with the idea of voting was the worst mistake in human history.

monarchies fundementally fail because they cannot consolidate military power behind one man

@de ton agreed

What do you mean? @Crux

What about Prussia then

because power is so centralized in individuals

prussia is essentially a monarch that is balanced by the Junker

monarchy can result in long term succession crises

like War of the Roses

Year of the 5 emperors

etc etc

power=violence
military strength=violence
if you make the military the state, the state cannot overthrow itself

Do you know how many republics had succession crises?

make the military the state

I come from South Korea which had multiple dictatorships

gate voting behind a volunteer military force

that includes religion

Why do you keep insisting on keeping elections and voting

Clearly it's failing rn

so to vote, you have to be a devout member of Christianity as vetted by the local parish, and also volunteer to fight for x amount of period of time

because voting is merely handed out by the accident of birth