What about Prussia then

because power is so centralized in individuals

prussia is essentially a monarch that is balanced by the Junker

monarchy can result in long term succession crises

like War of the Roses

Year of the 5 emperors

etc etc

power=violence
military strength=violence
if you make the military the state, the state cannot overthrow itself

Do you know how many republics had succession crises?

make the military the state

I come from South Korea which had multiple dictatorships

gate voting behind a volunteer military force

that includes religion

Why do you keep insisting on keeping elections and voting

Clearly it's failing rn

so to vote, you have to be a devout member of Christianity as vetted by the local parish, and also volunteer to fight for x amount of period of time

because voting is merely handed out by the accident of birth

universal suffrage is big gay

democracy is big gay

voting =/ democracy

Elections have only ever put hedonists and atheists in power. Nothing good has ever or will ever come from them.

you're missing the point

if you ensure your voters are of a certain type 1) warrior, 2)pious, then it (in theory) should be smooth sailing

How about no democracy and the monarch and church rule the land

it never works because there's always power struggles between the two entities

you just get a new monarch or dynasty after x amount of years

So?

there's inherent instability in the system

You get new political parties taking control of republic after x amount of years

I want to create the ultimate leviathan

You seriously think this is stable?

where the state can never be overthrown

what is "this"?

if you can point me to a limited suffrage state

Mate

have you read heinlein?

I'm trying to say a system other than monarchy isn't inherently more stable

I seriously buy into his ideology

hasn't been tried before

has enough merit to be tried

Why can't we just not have elections