I'll explain more later, back at work

Sounds like an overcomplicated mess

mental gymnastics: the school of thought

It is not him that tries to come up with obscure ways to present objections. It seems that what you call "mental gymnastics" is just answering to autism.

Today I learned that scripture is obscure.

Today I learned that scripture is mental gymnastics and an overcomplicated mess

uh

Are you trying to make a serious point or are you just shitposting?

Today I learned that we can rephrase what Jesus said because my own logic comes before the verbatim word of the Logos

I don't see any word of the logos saying that the blood and the flesh are disjoint

I must have missed that part of "scripture"

Don't project your rephrasing on me

kek

scholasticism, not even once

It's just common sense, brainlets

I'm not projecting shit, you illiterate fuckwit

I'm listening to the arguments presented by the cat side, and literally putting the argument being made *into* the relevant scripture if that was what the scripture actually said

What you call "putting the argument bla bla bla" is your over-rationalization and mental gymnastics seeing things where there are not 😃

Perfectly intuitive, since blood and flesh are inseparable in nature

They're literally not

Not my fault that you over analyze a simple mystery 😗 )

That's the richest thing I've ever heard

You only need overanalysis if you're justifying the seperation of the bread and the wine

It's pretty easy to drain blood out of meat and that doesn't sound inseparable to me

I mean, here you are, trying to come up with complex reasons why flesh and blood would not be related and joined with a thousand attempts to quote and analyze semantics

and aaron already confirmed that the seperation of the bread or the wine is inconsequential for the eucharist because the bread is both the body and blood, and the wine is also both the body and blood

While catholics have a simple, intuitive understanding of a mystery instead of your endless scholastic

Fucking address this

Shut the fuck up, troll

A bloo bloo bloo I am going to report you to the admin

That argument, saying that thigns can't be that way because there would be some kind of redoundancy or whatever, is like saying that there is no reason why God would reveal things through prophets instead of making a voice sound in our heads

You're changing the subject

@Daniil you started this 😂

I have zero faith in your ability to hold a legitimate discussion, without derailing it into irrelevant minutae

not even minutae

just irrelevancy

and mischaracterisation

I would be surprised, though, if your leavened bread was only one half : ^)

for someone who prides himself so much in the disdain towards reasoning and theological analysis, you sure love to have endless arguments about how you can separate whatever taking this or that into account

Do you want me to go full autism in reasoning and theological analysis?