@󠀂 󠀂 you asked for it. I pointed the fact he was unable to explain the logic deadlock about the filioque in the Summa. Then he attacked ad hominem. But personally I don't care.

Nor did I say that you were muslim

I guess it's fair to ban someone and keep insulting him😂

nor did ypu point out any deadlock

Though Im thankful that you shpwed everyone how that is the case

@Lao Tseu Takedown

"Concerning the Holy Spirit . . . it is not necessary to speak of him who must be acknowledged, who is from the Father and the Son, his sources" (The Trinity 2:29 [A.D. 357]).

@Quarantine_Zone it's on the new advent ?

My guess is yes

Ok let me find the source, thanks a lot to provide this.

There's the rest of the paragraph for context

I dont mind prots

I was a literal judaizer when i joined rel lol

You're the former CI dude, right? @Smackface

I was one of those "muh greatest ally" boomervatives when I joined rel

I was CI after that yes

I was Hebrew Roots lol

I was 16 and forced into it by my parents

I've been accused of being a judaizer before

So, I just discovered this girl who was smitten with me about this time last year is pro-life, incredibly conservative And wants children. Which took me by surprise.

Only problem is she's not particularly stable.

What would you lads do? 🤔

Mmmmm how unstable are we speaking?

>She's not stable

So what you're saying is she's a woman

A little more Batshit than standard woman nonsense.

Can you give some example? Overly emotional reactions? Nonsensicañ behaviour?

Be her rock, cuck

You probably wont get a better deal anyway, considering the pros you mentioned

Is she trad-cat?

@Quarantine_Zone

Here's the part where is mentionned the filioque in Schaff. Schaff translation is correct, even is procedit isn't similar to auctoribus, let's admit it. (Procedit is meaning proceed and auctoribus is meaning the author of)

Ummm

Can you explain further please

Now, let's check the footnote