Message from @Lao Tseu Takedown

Discord ID: 515989152567787531


2018-11-24 19:46:04 UTC  

So what you're saying is she's a woman

2018-11-24 19:47:56 UTC  

A little more Batshit than standard woman nonsense.

2018-11-24 19:54:07 UTC  

Can you give some example? Overly emotional reactions? Nonsensicañ behaviour?

2018-11-24 19:59:22 UTC  

Be her rock, cuck

2018-11-24 20:00:05 UTC  

You probably wont get a better deal anyway, considering the pros you mentioned

2018-11-24 20:04:26 UTC  

Is she trad-cat?

2018-11-24 20:30:53 UTC  
2018-11-24 20:31:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/515987756581912578/Screenshot_20181124-202756.jpg

2018-11-24 20:31:19 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/515987804879323146/unknown-1.png

2018-11-24 20:34:01 UTC  

Here's the part where is mentionned the filioque in Schaff. Schaff translation is correct, even is procedit isn't similar to auctoribus, let's admit it. (Procedit is meaning proceed and auctoribus is meaning the author of)

2018-11-24 20:34:18 UTC  

Ummm

2018-11-24 20:34:32 UTC  

Can you explain further please

2018-11-24 20:34:32 UTC  

Now, let's check the footnote

2018-11-24 20:34:39 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/515988645380096021/Screenshot_20181124-204912.jpg

2018-11-24 20:34:43 UTC  

I'm not entirely sure what's going on there

2018-11-24 20:34:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/515988668830449664/Screenshot_20181124-202810.jpg

2018-11-24 20:35:49 UTC  

In this footnote, it's saying the mention of the Son is non existent in the 3 original manuscripts.

2018-11-24 20:35:58 UTC  

Ahhh I see

2018-11-24 20:36:15 UTC  

So it's possibly a later addition in the newer manuscripts

2018-11-24 20:36:38 UTC  

Which would make sense too

2018-11-24 20:36:40 UTC  

And the add on has been made by the scrib, "si nostra nos non failli opinio"

2018-11-24 20:36:55 UTC  

By following our opinion,

2018-11-24 20:37:25 UTC  

Now let's go back in the text

2018-11-24 20:37:26 UTC  

@Based Chav you missed out you cuck

2018-11-24 20:37:29 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435520935647248414/515989356545179648/unknown-1.png

2018-11-24 20:37:39 UTC  

Women need a strong, rational man

2018-11-24 20:37:52 UTC  

Filio is an add on.

2018-11-24 20:38:09 UTC  

Unfortunately a lot of males nowadays fail to be men

2018-11-24 20:38:15 UTC  

Fair enough. Yeah, that certainly makes sense

2018-11-24 20:38:23 UTC  

Explains why there are so many lesbos

2018-11-24 20:38:55 UTC  

Men are told by the media that to be liked by women they have to not be a man from a young age

2018-11-24 20:38:59 UTC  

It's insidious

2018-11-24 20:39:21 UTC  

However. @Quarantine_Zone Hilaire develops his the chapter VIII and XII of the same book

2018-11-24 20:40:08 UTC  

Lmao yeah

2018-11-24 20:40:31 UTC  

Thing is during youth, sure women like that care free little fuckboy

2018-11-24 20:40:44 UTC  

But as they get older they realize they need someone strong and stable

2018-11-24 20:41:15 UTC  

Which is why I don't expect to have any luck rn because I'm 21 and don't like going for older women

2018-11-24 20:42:11 UTC  

~~I'm ugly af so I don't need to worry about lust~~

2018-11-24 20:42:48 UTC  
2018-11-24 20:42:57 UTC  

"As we have understood discussions . . . about the incorporeal natures, so too it is now to be recognized that the Holy Spirit receives from the Son that which he was of his own nature. . . . So too the Son is said to receive from the Father the very things by which he subsists. For neither has the Son anything else except those things given him by the Father, nor has the Holy Spirit any other substance than that given him by the Son" (The Holy Spirit 37 [A.D. 362]).

2018-11-24 20:43:08 UTC  

Didymus the Blind