Message from @Quarantine_Zone

Discord ID: 545046767348088832


2019-02-12 15:36:19 UTC  

Survivial of the Wisest, correct?

2019-02-12 15:38:10 UTC  

Something like that

2019-02-12 15:38:16 UTC  

As someone who has minor autism, I do believe vaccines cause issues.

2019-02-12 15:38:34 UTC  

Vaccines are 100% tools of the elite and I won't take them
They do indeed cause issues

2019-02-12 15:38:41 UTC  

Aspie myself

2019-02-12 15:42:49 UTC  

Yeah

2019-02-12 18:37:51 UTC  

TBH anti-vax type stuff hardly even popped up until the autism paper

2019-02-12 18:38:00 UTC  

Like the conspiracies were rather non-existent

2019-02-12 18:38:49 UTC  

Then the study was proven to be fabricated. The author himself admitted it was fabricated data. Then it got retracted

2019-02-12 18:39:18 UTC  

As it turns out, not all science is garbage

2019-02-12 18:39:46 UTC  

Please vaccinate yourself and children, for your good, their good, and the good of others

2019-02-12 19:21:45 UTC  

I'm not sure what a faked paper from 2002 has anything to do with invalidating Jonas Saik writing about using them for eugenics and population control in 1973

2019-02-12 19:23:03 UTC  

You also used the phrase "the conspiracies" refers to the conspiracy *theories*, and not the conspiracies themselves

2019-02-12 22:00:25 UTC  
2019-02-13 00:58:11 UTC  

@Mr. Byzantium I won't 😉

2019-02-13 00:59:24 UTC  

@ChuuniMage That's why I said the conspiracies didn't pop up until the paper. The eugenics stuff had already happened yeah.

2019-02-13 00:59:33 UTC  

I suppose my initial statement was off

2019-02-13 01:00:11 UTC  

I should have said, "TBH the anti-vax conspiracy theories hardly even popped up until the autism paper."

2019-02-13 01:01:15 UTC  

Issue with even just going to the 1970s though is that vaccines were used for so long before anyone was talking about eugenics

2019-02-13 01:02:29 UTC  

And supporting vaccination is different from forcing vaccination

2019-02-13 01:10:56 UTC  

I think most, if not all anti-vax arguments are ridiculous.

2019-02-13 01:16:05 UTC  

The single most important anti vax argument is that the father of vaccination said hey let's use these to weaken and kill everyone

2019-02-13 01:16:22 UTC  

there really is no debate on vax once you've learned that tbh

2019-02-13 01:52:03 UTC  

@Byzas father of vaccination... Let's see... Vaccination goes back to 17th century India and China at least. Innoculation in general goes back to 10th century China... It was known about in Europe by at least 1700 as we have records of it reaching Europe by then and inoculation was going in Greece in the beginning of the 18th century...

2019-02-13 01:52:57 UTC  

Jenner invented the first vaccine as we know it today in 1796...

2019-02-13 01:54:50 UTC  

Hilleman (1919-2005) invented more vaccines than anyone else and retired in 1984....

2019-02-13 01:55:23 UTC  

So who is the "father of vaccines" here that so horribly suggested we use them to weaken and kill people?

2019-02-13 01:55:50 UTC  

Perhaps such an individual is not the "father of vaccines" as you claim.

2019-02-13 01:58:46 UTC  

Surely not Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) either, who coined the term "vaccine?"

2019-02-13 01:59:50 UTC  

let me clarify
father of mass vaccination

2019-02-13 01:59:52 UTC  
2019-02-13 02:00:45 UTC  

Ok, so the guy who proposed vaccination en masse in the 1970s had poor intentions

2019-02-13 02:01:03 UTC  

Or rather, the guy who spearheaded it

2019-02-13 02:01:19 UTC  

But vaccination was in widespread use already before then

2019-02-13 02:01:30 UTC  

Perhaps not at the same scale, but in wide use indeed

2019-02-13 02:01:44 UTC  

And it had been for a long time

2019-02-13 02:02:14 UTC  

We even have records in the 1800s of vaccination campaigns in the US to prevent the deaths of Natives susceptible to disease

2019-02-13 02:03:09 UTC  

Antifa "grrr no guns"
Also antifa:

2019-02-13 02:03:26 UTC  

*Pulls out gun¨*