Message from @nervousShaqsh
Discord ID: 316578920449441805
vid about chink shit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_PhIGeiA7M
@Transience#0182 those guys can't chink the chinks
what a pair of noobs
Just learned that there's a law that **requires** testing shit on animals.
unironically kys Cheena
Testing what?
medical shit or just everything?
animal testing is a good thing
t. never had a pet
If you lack basic compassion to say that, might as well offer your moms ass for chemicals testing.
animal testing is a good thing as long as its done after initial laboratory evaluation and testing
you do know that test animals are breed for that and only for that. They have no survival instincts nor such to kick in if released to wild only way to end it would be kill the animals
>breed for that
Here we go again.
example the generic "white lab rat" has somewhat thicker skin and are breed to be healthy
and i bet they get 100x better and more suitable diet and living conditions when they are not being tested
than your average "pet"
same goes with human trials
healthy very targeted audience with proper health checks done first
but i agree
that its wrong if its done cause of some makeup/shampoo reasons
for medical testing i understand and agree with it
I feel like we're talking about different things.
I don't really care how they bred or shit like that. They're still living beings that go through suffering and abuse because of that shit.
And it's not like we're in fucking 19th century anymore. I believe there are plenty of ways to avoid that. Forcing animal testing by a fucking law -- this is utter bullshit.
we dont have proper ways of testing how living tissue reacts to X and Y
other than using said living tissue
If there are cruelty free companies out there I don't really get what prevents others to adopt the same testing methods.
in this case whole organism is needed to spot possible side-effects
you know that those labels "not animal tested"
is just outsourced to companies who provide separe chemicals and minerals who do testing
but the product itself is not tested on animals
just cause no need when indegrients (what are calculated not to be reactive with each other) are tested by companies who sent them to that company
from FDA "Some companies may apply such claims solely to their finished cosmetic products. However, these companies may rely on raw material suppliers or contract laboratories to perform any animal testing necessary to substantiate product or ingredient safety. Other cosmetic companies may rely on combinations of scientific literature, non-animal testing, raw material safety testing, or controlled human-use testing to substantiate their product safety."
aka : either others test the materials, or search data if someone has already tested it in the past
soon we have enough data about past to all items to be "cruelty free"
This is fucking hell. Just release some deadly incurable turbo cancer on us, for fucks sake. Let this planet rest for once.
hell even PETA agrees with me in this one (and i hate their asses time to time more than i hate greenpeace)
hell europe even has banned "the sale of cosmetics with ingredients tested on animals." what is impossible as most of our normal indegrients have been tested on animals at some point in time
iirc PETAS stance on medical trials on animals is " its to be avoided if possible in any decent and safe means but if no such test exists then we dont have any choice"
or something along those lines
whoa lads
#shit-about-chian
fuck
<#248100475054850050>