noooo

that doesn't have an actual AFE

ive been looking into cheap digital scopes but they all seem shit

tf is afe

get like a siglent or rigol or something

$300-$400

fuck that noise

im poor

that price range will do more than you'll ever need for audio

but anything below $300 is probably not gonna cut it for any precice or accurate measurements

so the cheap ADC route doesnt work?

how's $260

afaik achimago uses a uca202 for his measurements

siglent sds1052dl, can confirm it's more than up to the task

it has rolloff but otherwise its pretty accurate it seems

i guess you could, but you'll have an easier time of it if you use a scope

i dont really have the option if im a poor fuck

most of my money im investing into my business so i dont really have much play room

if you're willing to learn how to use em, aslk around electronics forums for old analog scopes

ive used a few cro's before

those'll still beat the hell out of a usb adc, and can be had free with some hunting and asking

nah theyre pretty rare here

i'd just give you mine but shipping is a tremendous expensive bitch

ive been looking for a good while

kek

ya

those cheap digital scopes like the dso138 are pretty much useless tho right?

wouldn't even defile my trashcan with one

lol

ok

no point wasting 30 bucks then i guess

yeah, if your budget is rly that tight get the best usb adc you can find and watch the signal in audacity

why audacity?

there are actual programs like RAA that do that shit

16/44.1 if you can, that way it _only_ shows noise within human hearing range

rmaa*

while a scope or a high-res adc you'll be looking at shit your cat can't even hear

thermal noise and all will be visible

audacity is free and super easy to use is why

rmaa is free

is also pretty versatile