the whole "ya but its all analogue" argument is true but imo the mad noise, dynamic range and inconvenience factors completely overshadow any issues digital might have

ye but its cool dude

its just spinning plastic

id rather frame it to look at lol

wheres the fun in listenin to classical

if you don't have to get up and turn it over

It's irrelevant either way, cause it's recorded from a digital source anyway these days

eh there are some purist studios who still give a shit for some reason

but yeah almost all of it will have been converted at least once

vinyl is $$$ as well

i wanna build my own tt

both in equipment

and actual records lol

eugh this song has some stupid 16k squeal

did they fucking record this next to a crt

maybe they're just deaf lol

probably

There is no point of going beyond 16 bit irl
At 85db listening you only need 75db of range.
Unless the headphones can reproduce the slight noise a falling leaf makes and the chance of your eardrums still picking it up at >18

Yes or no

Yes

neither measurement looks great

no

Basssss

No.

more bass = better

https://gyazo.com/181e0366580f859816e238d1c5c9d1e1

1000kbps of regret

`hello guys welcome to my guide`

https://gyazo.com/2edc99f8cd6991f1bebc69219a391196

Conclusion: fuck ogg, opus is ok, and MP3/flac/opus 512 best

opus 192 is fine for vocal focused pieces

clearenuff™

i managed to tell the diff erence between 320 mp3 and flac once

i had toplay the same 0.5s snare though over and over again

the flac souded slightly crispier

yeah you gotta be a major autist to care enough

like me

i mean is it really worth it

the ~15mb more

yes

mostly for archival