Message from @wolfman1911

Discord ID: 591399450228949013


2019-06-20 22:36:54 UTC  

he gets his sets mixed up

2019-06-20 22:37:16 UTC  

if A is a subset of B, he will say all B are A.

2019-06-20 22:37:18 UTC  

basically

2019-06-20 22:39:18 UTC  

lemme flesh that out a bit more

2019-06-20 22:40:56 UTC  

let A := ancaps, B := libertarians.
∀ A, A ⊆ B.

2019-06-20 22:41:53 UTC  

he tries to say ∀ B, B ⊆ A

2019-06-20 22:44:46 UTC  

Every rectangle is a square

2019-06-20 22:46:42 UTC  

@Big T I was talking about the sentencing disparities between men and women earlier btw. Women get lighter sentences even when they are armed and attacking and unarmed man, a case in which, I would argue, the physical power differential does not matter. Women are always thought of as victims and even if they attack a man we ask what the man did to make them attack him. We dont do that if a man attcks a woman.

2019-06-20 22:47:29 UTC  

I didn't come here for your Set bullshit Travis. I spent a lot of time letting that knowledge leak out of my brain, and I don't appreciate your efforts to shove it back in.

2019-06-20 22:47:47 UTC  

Idk why the physical power difference matters so much

2019-06-20 22:47:55 UTC  

If I bunch some chick in the face I punched her

2019-06-20 22:48:05 UTC  

If she punches me in the face she punched me

2019-06-20 22:48:07 UTC  

Same intent

2019-06-20 22:48:09 UTC  

so thats not a legal difference but a practical one

2019-06-20 22:48:21 UTC  

haha @wolfman1911 should i bring back eigenvectors too?

2019-06-20 22:48:21 UTC  

Not written in law

2019-06-20 22:48:28 UTC  

But the judges make it so?

2019-06-20 22:48:49 UTC  

@scaevola ah, well thats a different subject. valid self defense claims would result in no sentencing.

2019-06-20 22:48:56 UTC  

look at bigTravis trying to make us smart... I doubt it

2019-06-20 22:49:19 UTC  

haha every little bit helps

2019-06-20 22:50:16 UTC  

I don't even remember eigenvectors at all. Though I suppose it's worth noting that I payed a lot less attention in linear algebra than in the class that talked about sets.

2019-06-20 22:50:51 UTC  

lol well to be fair, you would use sets a lot more often in industry

2019-06-20 22:53:23 UTC  

@wolfman1911 do you remember gaussian random variables? their PDFs are ugly imo

2019-06-20 22:54:49 UTC  

Gosh, you are throwing at me concepts that came from different classes years apart.

2019-06-20 22:55:06 UTC  

oh those were different classes? shit that was one class for us

2019-06-20 22:56:13 UTC  

sets, graphs, halting problem, stable marriage problem, inductive proofs, probability, counting, discrete and continuous random variables, expectation and variance, etc

2019-06-20 22:56:23 UTC  

modular arithmetic

2019-06-20 22:56:32 UTC  

RSA encryption

2019-06-20 22:56:39 UTC  

uh what else did we cover

2019-06-20 22:56:43 UTC  

packet loss

2019-06-20 22:56:47 UTC  

lol

2019-06-20 22:56:54 UTC  

markov chains

2019-06-20 22:57:13 UTC  

We had two classes that were the computer science department's 'discrete math' classes that covered stuff like set theory, combinatorics, and several other things of that nature, then we also had to take a seperate linear algebra class and a probability and statistics class in addition to calculus 1 and 2.

2019-06-20 22:57:55 UTC  

Yeah, a lot of those things were covered in different classes that were all required.

2019-06-20 22:57:59 UTC  

yea my community college did it that way, was much more palatable

2019-06-20 22:58:16 UTC  

here at UC berkeley they give you all of that in one class.

2019-06-20 22:58:42 UTC  

the prereq was calc 2. lin alg was a seperate class as well

2019-06-20 22:58:52 UTC  

That seems like a terrible way to actually learn it.

2019-06-20 22:59:01 UTC  

its a sink or swim class

2019-06-20 22:59:09 UTC  

its meant to weed out the undesirables

2019-06-20 22:59:10 UTC  

If you are jumping around from topic to topic like that.