Message from @Catboi

Discord ID: 668869914538541087


2020-01-20 17:24:05 UTC  

You know one child policy wasn't just 1 child

2020-01-20 17:24:09 UTC  

they'd not let some people breed

2020-01-20 17:24:16 UTC  

force them to get abortions

2020-01-20 17:24:25 UTC  

Regardless

2020-01-20 17:24:57 UTC  

as I said, you could debate whether it is autistically eugenics or not, but that's hair splitting that's arguing sematnics rather than actually rseponding to the point...

2020-01-20 17:25:07 UTC  

All knowledge is provisional

2020-01-20 17:25:36 UTC  

Even if we find some way to improve populations thorugh breeding and biotech we can't forsee all the consequences

2020-01-20 17:25:43 UTC  

we don't know what the negative externalities will be

2020-01-20 17:26:54 UTC  

There's no way to experiment what such policies and programs would produce in the long run, and then you've got instances where we could inevitably make our populations susceptible to unforseen dangers, diseases for example that everyone is susceptible to because of the big brained "breeding program"

2020-01-20 17:27:19 UTC  

Nigger, eugenics is *explicitly* defined as attempting to increase the frequency of desirable heritable traits.

2020-01-20 17:27:32 UTC  

Still not actually confronting the point being made

2020-01-20 17:27:35 UTC  

HMM I WONDER WHY

2020-01-20 17:27:49 UTC  

it's almost like you'd rather argue about definitions than respond to the argument.

2020-01-20 17:27:50 UTC  

The intent is what makes it eugenics or not.

2020-01-20 17:28:02 UTC  

Yeah, because you have no point.

2020-01-20 17:28:04 UTC  

TURBO AUTIST MODE ENGAGE

2020-01-20 17:28:36 UTC  

Under your paradigm, any policy that tangentially touches reproduction is """eugenics""".

2020-01-20 17:28:49 UTC  

Lol.

2020-01-20 17:28:53 UTC  

Cry moar.

2020-01-20 17:29:58 UTC  

You attempted to demonstrate a point about eugenics drawn form an explicitly agenic policy, you Downie.

2020-01-20 17:30:14 UTC  

>1 child has nothing to do with yousheng

2020-01-20 17:30:17 UTC  

>it's not eugenics

2020-01-20 17:30:31 UTC  

Kind of important for you to show the policy is in anyway related to what you're trying to extrapolate.

2020-01-20 17:30:45 UTC  

>I know nothing about CHinese politics but I'll rant on about how it's not eugenics because I can't actually respond to the negative externalities question.

2020-01-20 17:31:09 UTC  

The one child policy wasn't just one child

2020-01-20 17:31:13 UTC  

>the negative externalities question

2020-01-20 17:31:16 UTC  

even by your definition it's eugenitics

2020-01-20 17:31:26 UTC  

You mean the one only going on in your head?

2020-01-20 17:31:36 UTC  

🙄

2020-01-20 17:31:43 UTC  

Lol. I'm the OED now?

2020-01-20 17:31:47 UTC  

Okay, so this is religious for you

2020-01-20 17:31:48 UTC  

Based retard.

2020-01-20 17:31:49 UTC  

Got it

2020-01-20 17:32:20 UTC  

I mean... all my policy positions stem from my religion...?

2020-01-20 17:32:36 UTC  

Not sure what you're accusing me of though.

2020-01-20 20:46:11 UTC  

Zoomer exposes rogan

2020-01-20 21:09:29 UTC  

Zoomer is a tripple agent who is sponsored by Alex Jones who is close friends with joe rogan

2020-01-20 21:09:50 UTC  

can't be trusted

2020-01-20 21:11:21 UTC  

Wat

2020-01-20 21:12:52 UTC  

It's all a CIA plot maaaaaan